Friday, October 01, 2021

September Year Forward 2021

 September 2021


Lignans.  Flaxseed.  


Swim and wander day today.  Casa Alegre all up and booked.  Beautiful morning today.  


Phil

Not  looking for new digs until estate is settled and this house is mine.   Likely not until next year.    Until then things are up in the air.   And I do have to empty that fucking garage full of packed boxes and deal with my own stuff in a storage locker that is costing me  $187.50 a month and will likely go up to $250.


Not anticipating a condo.   Think rental would be easier.  If something breaks or wears out, just call the landlord.   Ownership includes too many possible hassles, although I may look into condos and see if something possibly appeals.


Dining facility would be a big plus.   I don't cook; I only microwave.   So getting genuinely prepared cooked food at one meal of the day seems desirable.


This morning I was hit especially hard by the idea that Peg was once a person, but at 5:30 pm on June 4 became just a thing.  Person-to-thing thought was hard to take. 


——


Toibin has Thomas Mann saying the same thing about mourning the loss of his mother.  I'm getting to enjoy more listening to books on audible.  Maybe Toibin writes good bestseller novels.  Many more than I'd realized.  This one on Mann is better than I'd expected.  Now understand that Death in Venice came earlier in his career—-the splash of a young writer's energies, way before Magic Mountain.  Which I will have no interest in re-reading even after all these years and even knowing that when I read it I had no idea what it was about.  


Super quiet Friday morning.  Willow on second swim of the week.  Cool, beautiful day.   More Toibin on Mann.  More Musil:  he has so many quotables on every page:  "Knowledge is a mode of conduct, a passion.  At bottom, an impermissible mode of conduct: like diposomania, sex mania, homicidal mania, the compulsion to know forms its own character that is off-balance.  It is simply not so that the researcher pursues the truth; it pursues him." 231


By 2 pm today I hope it will be clear that Eloy has been able to drive the VW to Casa Alegre.  Will there be a hitch at the dealership?  Stay tuned.  


"[So] . . . 'until further notice you refuse to be a human being?'  . . . 'More or less.  It has an unpleasant feeling of dilettantism about it.'"  231


Sunday 

20 years since the World Trade Center attack.  Emma is now 10, so her birth divides the period perfectly.  Eliot 7.  


VW owners once more.  Nostalgia of sorts no doubt.  Car now plugged in and ensconced on the epoxy-floored garage of 3601.  Alegre rented for two whole weeks now.  Next coming and main week of the Balloons.  


stair-climber technician here.  full shot of coffee feels way too strong now.  Mudwater mushrooms ok but seem muddy and you wonder what they do in the gi tract?  Beautiful day.  Guess I'll go over to Salt Hill for lunch and walk the Lebanon green again.  Finish listening to Toibin's biography of Mann.  Now that I've looked at another biography, skimmingly, the one by Hayman, I can get a sense of why Toibin the artist wanted to do what he did.  He reads all or some of the biographies available and mainly he pores over Mann's diaries.  He had many burned when he died but some survived and have given biographers a rich horde.  Toibin can now shape the material into a new art work, correcting and elevating the raw materials of the biographies.  What better demonstration of art and life than to re-work the life as told by lower-rung scribblers and chroniclers?  And the largest question, shaped by Boswell I suppose but ancients also—-can a biography be a work of art in its own right?  Zenith's Pessoa I could propose.  Probably Ellmann's Joyce would be nominated.  


Caffeine chatter.   Email from Nancy Reed.   Aunt Zamova will be 91 on the 29th of this month.  In a memory care residence in Colorado.  Teresa wants to shower her with birthday cards and notes.  Guess we could include a recent photo of us just to add to her confusion.  Rich mentioned that he remembers things that happened to him when he was seven more clearly than what he had for dinner a day ago.  Maybe a photo of faces would spark something in Zamova's memory.  Who can tell any of these things?


Tristan the tech.  All-ways sold to a corporation NSM.  No one is happy about it.  Will that outfit close before we no longer need a technician for the Stannah?  


Why am I so susceptible to Nicholas's book suggestions?  here is the latest on Instagram:  "A Theatrical ghost story, an encounter with the anima (Jung thought Priestley his best lay interpreter) and a redeemed new life in the new reprint of Priestley’s novel."  At this moment I welcome it to shake me away from Thomas Mann and his biographers—-what a tangle of interpretation that seems to be—the biography rather than or along with the novels.  Symbolic of mid-century frustrations?  Anyway, would I like Priestley?  Have seen his name for years.  And if Jung praised him, then he is a must read !!! 


https://www.nytimes.com/1972/10/08/archives/there-really-was-a-super-suicide-society-there-was-a-super-suicide.html


"In the deep, tacit way in which feeling becomes stronger than thought, I had always felt that the Devon school came into existence the day I entered it, was vibrantly real while I was a student there, and then blinked out like a candle the day I left."   page one of Knowles A Separate Peace 


decided I will read all of Knowles and forget about Mann.  Profile of Toibin in the New Yorker made me respect him less.  He's an artful writer, and assigmentist! or reporter.   Musil's essayism helped too.  Did I ever know there was  a movie made of the book?  Clarifying interviews with Knowles made around the time of the movie release, '72.  His career never reached the popularity of the first book.  Indicative of what might have been, or what maybe usually happens to INFP writers who manage to write and hit it and then miss a lot (just think of how many there are—-the writer down in Keene, name now forgotten, the novelist at La Salle when I was there, no fame whatsoever that I could tell and yet a steady output over years.  Knowles born in 1926, exactly a generation before us.  He published it when he was thirty-three.  

Phil asked about Pessoa after reading the NYRB article.  

I said—It was a very gradual process.  In '82 or '86 we were in Barcelona for a while and I went to a British bookstore there often.  I bought a book of Pessoa's poetry, bi-lingual edition.  ButI took little interest in it, put off I think by the long introduction's discussion of the heteronymns.  I suppose after that I would see his name here or there.  Merton translated a fewof his poems but I learned that much later.  I think sometime in the mid-90s I saw reference to The Book of Disquiet and got interested in finding a copy of that.  That period waswhen I was consciously looking for translated books, especially Spanish and Latin American.  I started to notice the translations of a British woman, Margaret Jull Costa.  She's nowrecognized and is even famous for her translations from the Spanish and Portuguese.  So I must have made an effort to find the book of Disquiet about then.  It blew me away---a failed novel, or a novel in fragments, or not a novel but no one could say what except that it had marks of genius almost hitherto unnoticed in the larger literary world.  etc etc  Richard Zenith's translation came out in '91 in England.  In the late 90s I'd say, more and more people started talking about Pessoa, on blogs I guess.  Blogs discussing books were starting up back then.  NowI think most have faded.  In Disquiet Pessoa voices so well the late 20th C moods of anxiety, emptiness, weariness, pseudo reality, aimlessness that other writers were voicing and thefact that he did it by himself at the start of the century without any recognition made him a kind of lone wolf figure way before Kerouac etc.  Just became interesting to find out about.  


Passage that gives perspective I was looking for :   


"Musil's great novel, The Man Without Qualities, easily challenges The Magic Mountain in boldness of conception and visionary reach.  Like Mann, he is a master of the essayistic voice.  At his best, he is such a rigorous stylist that after him Kafka may appear immature, Mann chatty, Brecht arch, Rilke precious, and Walter Benjamin hermetic.  We know that he considered Mann and overrated hack, little better than Musil's countryman Stefan Zweig.  They seemed to share at most an interest in adolescent sexuality—-Musil's claim that Törless's storyline merely provided the occasion for abstract inquiry can be discounted.  


Knowles—-A Separate Peace  "“Here the road turned to the left and became dirt. It proceeded along the lower end of the playing fields, and under the pale night glow the playing fields swept away from me in slight frosty undulations which bespoke meanings upon meanings, levels of reality I had never suspected before, a kind of thronging and epic grandeur which my superficial eyes and cluttered mind had been blind to before. They unrolled away impervious to me as though I were a roaming ghost, not only tonight but always, as though I had never played on them a hundred times, as though my feet had never touched them, as though my whole life at Devon had been a dream, or rather that everything at Devon, the playing fields, the gym, the water hole, and all the other buildings and all the people there were intensely real, wildly alive and totally meaningful, and I alone was a dream, a figment which had never really touched anything. I felt that I was not, never had been and never would be a living part of this overpoweringly solid and deeply meaningful world around me.”  


swoon swoon, my kind of moody writing indeed.  so hoping that it will be present in at least some of his other books.  have order copies of them all!!!


Musil has his essayism and is the greater writer, do doubt.  But someone like Knowles writes "for me" as do very few other writers.  Would I have loved to have been him, have had a writing career such as he did?  Much harder to know that. 


Did we read A Separate Peace at LaSalle before you went off to Exeter?  Or did I read it after you went?  It was published in 1959.  Just re-read it. Always paired in my memory with Agee's A Death in the Family.  I'd now say S Peace is better.   Knowles had that one magic hit, his first book.  After a slow start it caught the wave of the times and sales went out of the atmosphere.  Gave him a comfortable life with no need to work.  Six books followed but none of them ever came close to it. Career very similar in that regard to a writer here in NH.  Had a super hit on the first book thereafter not so much.  Guess there are plenty like that in lit history.  Ellison.  


Surprise visit today of Va's sister and husband from Texas.  They phone two days ago from Albany saying hey we're coming!  We grumbled to ourselves last night that we didn't feel really up to

it---still decompressing from our kids visit.  But also good to see them of course.  Cooler weather, leaves turning, pumpkins out.  


Phil confirms what I had remembered——

I know that I read SP after I had started at Exeter.  It could have even been after I graduated.   I remember that when I read it I recognized the bridge Knowles used to describe where the "accident" occurred.  However, in real life I don't think there was any tree around the bridge.  It was in the middle of soccer fields and crossed a river (the Squamscott River??) that one had to cross on the way to the school's football stadium.  

 

The only other thing I remember from the book is the unusual hat that the central character wore and that he lived in NYC.  Clothes and NYC were evidently meaningful to young Philip.  Other than that, it's a blank.   Then again, so is most of my past life these days.  I remember some unusual events but little else.   For example, I remember getting hit by a car when I was riding my bike in Lavale when I was 8 or so.  I turned in front of the car.  I was the guilty person, not the car driver.   After I got hit I remember looking up at the undercarriage of the car as I lay in the road  (old Route 40 on its way to Frostburg) and wondering if I was dead.


So you may have read SP at Lasalle, but I'm pretty sure it was well after I had left for Exeter.


One hit wonders:  They certainly exist in the music world, and  it's not hard to imagine that a lot of writers have only one thing to say that appeals to others - just like rocknroll singers/bands.  I had five things to say, but I don't think those five things interested others very much.  Your reviews were very nice.


"Hell is others."   I'm willing to bet that Sartre wrote that when he was at least in his 70s.   When one is younger, we like others a lot more than we do when we get past 70.   Yet, being totally on one's own as I am is no fun.  There is a constant feeling of emptiness in every day. 


Somewhat cooler here, but it doesn't feel or look like fall yet in this area.   Temps usually still hit the 80s at some point during the day.  The warm, muggy, sinful south!


Wonder whatever happened to Joe Boyle 


P

———


So no one could imagine the impact SP had on me.  I easily plugged myself into the narrator and Phil into Finny, especially since he had abandoned me to go off to Exeter, of all places.  I never had heard of it and then a year later he was there and I was reading all about it in Knowles novel.  Too personal and uncanny for me to take.  I found I had a vocation and took up a life of prayer.  Not much fasting, but lots of moody praying and meditating and walking.  I was abandoned and jealous-envious that Phil had gotten out!  The novel spooks me now because of all of this.  I had forgotten all about Leper's nervous breakdown.  That sort of thing must have been in the air a lot in the sense that '56 being twenty years after '46, many were experiencing PTSD long before we understood much about it, or that it got defined and studied.  The novel explores the anxiety of being readied to go off to war in those kids.  Brilliantly too.  Sensitively.  Somehow it almost seems I "ingested" the novel deeply enough to re-live it in the years at Elkins Park, a version of Devon that merged for me the memories of high school with the new experiences of college, formation, monastic militarism, and general anxious cluelessness about everything, especially my emotions, my feelings, my sense of being lost within the secure yet confining bubble of Catholic religious life.  All male.  A continuation of high school without the softening of family and town roots.  Strangers were we all and a bit older, more developed, super-pious and super charged.  

—-

Yup,  he's always "Rabbit" to me, too.


Just tried to pick some Lasallite at random?   Joe had some brains.   Did he use them?   What did he do for employment.  My interest is totally quixotic so I don't want to bother anyone who might mention my question to Joe……P


First to arrive is an old bantam paperback, yellow edges, of Knowles Spreading Fires.  next up  not bantam but Ballantine


Not surprising at all that this passage floats up, because I knew from the start in SP all that long ago that Knowles knew me:

"Even then he knew what jealousy was.  Jealousy was an expression of inadequacy:  people are envious because they are deeply frightened, frightened that they don't possess enough to survive by themselves, to flourish with no one to lean on." 17  Such a key meme in SP and I'll bet in all of Knowles's books.  


Watched the newer movie of Separate Peace on YouTube.  Some added material about the war, some rearrangement of material,

and much removal of ambiguity, of all kinds.  Could even say it has been schoolified to go with the twenty years of massive popularity on high school reading lists.  Earlier movie stayed more closely to the text.  And kept the remembered past as frame.  Later version used the mock trial as the lead-in and partial frame.  Judgment over ambivalence.  And yet I have to admit the one frame that brought me to tears in the second version was when Gene sees their empty dorm room, bare, mattresses rolled up.  Something there reminded me greatly of the bare, emptiness of dorms in general when empty, and of Anselm Hall.  The death of Finney got re-enacted for me in my abrupt departure from Anselm Hall.  Taking the train from Philly to DC and then Cumberland.  


28  Dave's birthday.  Short visit with him.  Emma drew a picture of him with two half-faces in one:  Big Daddy Fantastic and Papa.  


Short phone call to Jim.  Was on his way out to dinner, sounded like his old self.  


Phil J says his great grandfather may have helped found the KKK.

Phil H says his father used his law degree to get into the FBI.  Ran some family 5&10s with his brother, camp director organist.  


Finished Knowles Spreading Fires. 1974.  14 years after Separate.  Had I somehow read it before.  The whole plot of the crazy Canadian butler in the South of France sounds so familiar, perhaps I did.  Hyper Catholic mother controlling Brendan's sense of guilt and sexuality.  Hints at more than friendship with Xavier, the unreliable Frenchman.  Resonances pinged and then forgotten about.  Can underline passages I might have written.  Would have written.  Good descriptions of waking nightmares, anxiousness, "he knew where he was but he did not really know who he was." 114  "The aching void at the center of his self was now widening, deepening;  115  


"Madness: the most contagious disease in the world." 81 Spreading Fires, 1974


Story based very loosely on my grandmother who came to Cumberland from Montgomery Alabama with her new husband who had was from Florence, Alabama but had studied medicine in New York City (where he heard about a growing, thriving town named Cumberland).  So nothing Appalachian in their backgrounds.    She lost a child that she took back to Alabama, but it was her fourth (of 7) child.  Nor was she religious so the godliness vs Satanism came from something I probably heard or read somewhere.  Her father had been the adjutant to General Nathan Bedford Forrest in the Civil war. Forrest later founded the KKK and I expect my great grandfather played a role in that, too……….P


Passed down.   Because Dad's family was southern family history was important and known, traced back to 1620 or so altthough the Jones name only traced back to some clerk in the Bank of England around 1866.  Mom, who was an orphan, knew a little of her biological family's history but not much.  Her mother was from Irish-American family (O'brien)and father was from German family (Meuller) that had emigrated from Heidelburg to Philadelphia.  And that's about all mom knew.  Mom's mother died when Mom was 2. That was in 1910. Her father, Harry Meuller, who had been a peripatetic photographer, disappeared soon thereafter, and Mom never knew what happened to him.  The family that adopted her were best friends with Mom's grandmother, also dead.   They were Irish Catholic and ran a funeral home in a suburb of Philadelphia.  Mom and dad met when she took a job in a lab at the Jefferson Medical School in Philadelphia.  Dad was a student at that med school. 


KKK: No one in the family ever said whether William Ford had helped found the KKK; they would only say that he had been Forrest's adjutant during the war.  He later became the postmaster in Montgomery, AL.......... P 


Knowles in Esquire 25 years after the publication:

Gene is suspected of having provoked this “accident” out of buried resentment, and sometimes he thinks so himself. One of their group meanwhile goes off to the military service and soon after creeps back to Devon, “psycho.” And then the students stage a mock trial to try Gene, and the book moves on to its climax. It is a schoolboy story and it is also an allegory about the sources of war.

A Separate Peace is one long and abject confession, a mea culpa, a tale of crime—if a crime had been committed—and of no punishment, or only interior punishment.

These responses, of course, are the greatest reward A Separate Peace can bring or ever will bring to me. The book has affected millions of lives, influenced them deeply, modified what they saw and felt in the world about them. The ultimate importance of A Separate Peace is that it has reached out to the readers who need it.  "


My short story "Annie Ford's Northern Home" was based very loosely on my grandmother.   Her name was Annie Ford and she came from Montgomery, Alabama.   She  lost a child in Cumberland, which she regarded as a northern town, and took it south for burial.   But it wasn't her first child and Annie wasn't particularly religious.    So  back in the mid-1970s where the hell did I come up with those ideas about Satan in a Pennsylvania coal town?  


I really didn't know until I got in a conversation yesterday with a guy from Italy who told me that he liked visiting American state capitol buildings.  Bingo!  In the 1970s I visited the state capitol buildings of Maryland and Pennsylvania, and I think those visits triggered my foray into god vs the devil. 


In Annapolis I was amazed at how  modest and open the capitol building was.  Dating back to 1772, the building felt very open to the public and modest in size.  Its windows were clear glass so people could look from outside the building right into the Assembly and Senate chambers.  There was a real Jeffersonian feeling to the building: a meeting place for citizen-politicians who would discuss things openly,  in full view of any interested citizens.  It was built of red brick  with a white wood dome.


In contrast to that. the feeling of modesty and openness in Annapolis, the Pennsylvania state capitol building seemed a massive stone temple that celebrated not citizen involvement, but, rather,  the wealth and power of the state when the building was begun in 1902 and opened in 1906.  The windows, even the overhead domes, were all stained glass so no one could just look inside, and the dark marble-walled chambers reeked of the state's wealth.   Light in the chambers was provided by lamps, not clear windows on all levels and it did have multiple levels.   


So I think that's where the Satan vs God aspect of my story came from.   To me, there was something Satanic and morgue-like about the huge Pennsylvania capitol building and something  fresh, open, and living about the much smaller and simpler Maryland state capitol.  I didn't think of the Maryland building as godlike when in Annapolis.  I think that connection only came later, when I went through the building in Harrisburg and felt a connection in it  to digging deep in the earth and using fire to create power over people.  But I'm pretty certain the contrast of the two buildings is what set off those religious  ideas that permeate my short story.  And I'm pretty sure I would never have remembered that without talking with the Italian guy who brought up state capitol buildings.


Phil

———


30 september Thursday  

Who should I see at MB parking lot as we were leaving around 1 pm but Ethan Paquin and his newish wife, Ellen?  He had been on my mind the past week or two!  Now living in Mississippi where she took a job, and reading books on solo ocean voyaging.  Through with all past incarnations!

Hope he will meet for a coffee or lunch but doubtful or he would have

replied to my emails from this afternoon.  Very glad to see him, though.  


Good quick talk with Jim yesterday too, or Tuesday, around 4.  


Knowles, Summer: 28  reaching.  That was all he asked for out of life, to be allowed to go toward those elements which gave it meaning and made it full of wonder.  


John Knowles, the third of four children of James Myron and Mary Beatrice Shea Knowles, was born in Fairmont, West Virginia. He has an older brother and sister who are twins, and a younger sister. 

Wednesday, September 08, 2021

August 2021 Year Forward

 Sunday August 1  


Giga and Mila hit the road for Nantucket.  Mick and family arriving soon after weekend of camping in North Woodstock.  


Monday  Dream about Adam Driver, was walking down a hill in Plymouth.  Chatted a bit, said after his upcoming two movies to make transformation would follow!!  First day of day camp, theater camp.  Family practiced their opening lines at dinner last night.  Eliot and Emma gung ho.  Bobby was urged not to be shy but he said he was shy, didn't want to be there, and wanted to go home.  Cécile said she wanted to be as loud as possible.  Cool again today, breezy.  October in August. Or maybe September.  I would have preferred to have been Pessoa much more than Lax.  I now conflate the image of Professor T with Pessoa.  Magritte-ish conflation.  Hoping for news from Eloy about removal of the carport.  Nothing yet.  Making a daily practice of looking at the photos of Casa Alegre now online from pre-buy days.  Preparing imaginary experiences of what the decorated version will look like.  Preparing imaginary experiences of what it will feel like to be in the house, to get used to it, to sleep in it, to live there.  "Who are you here, who are you here, who are you here?"—P  Willow told Warren the piano is his to send forward now.  Most of the carport is down and the photo shows the structure and how it is being dismantled.  Reminder in the photo of the small skylight over the main bathroom.  We will search vanities and sinks to see what height they are these days and whether we might replace what's there to free up some room for the shower.  Sipping High Noon with the kids.  David clarified that this brand does not use seltzer (salty) but vague flavor and sparkling water and small alcohol, same as beer.  I bought a blueberry pie and the kids brought home four small pies from the local bakery.  Great minds.  They went up Rattlesnake for a hike, Jon, Dave and C.  E and E are excited to have the scripts for their plays and a device of folded paper for telling the future.  Em's told me I might travel to Cuba (in Spain). and El told me that I would break my leg on the 25th of October for Halloween.  Hope he's not right about that one!!  Last night we did talk to Dave about our big topics regarding health, death, the two houses and future plans and possibilities.  Nothing clear emerged but at least we did it.  

Basement almost dry.  Rain tonight and tomorrow.  "I'm the gap between what I'd like to be and what others have made me, / Or half the gap, since there's also life . . . "  —-P   Standard height twenty years ago probably "30-32".  Today Comfort Height is 35-37".  So we will want to put in a new vanity.  Another 1.5k!  +/-  While David cooks pasta dinner, kids are practicing their lines.  


"I pulled Endymion onto the bandwagon and he kicked me off at the Rose Parade."   My tweet the other day.  Originally said Andyman, meaning Aciman, but changed it to be more cowardly and not to hurt his feelings, as if he would ever see it.  Anticipation for his review of Zenith.  Expect it to show up in NYRB, super long, as though he's been a Pessoa devotee for years and not the rushed add-on he put into his Irrealis collection at the last minute after I woke him up to Pessoa.  So his piece will be long and showy and he will use his languages to quibble about translations as he did fifteen years ago over Proust translations.  Will he admire Zenith's achievement sufficiently??  With the honesty Toíbín shows, zeal and nuance.  Real appreciation for both Pessoa and Zenith.  Ha, me pretending I have a personal investment in all of it just because I've read the book and now enjoy the reviews from an imagined insider position.  The imaginary connoisseur.  Pessoa does with his imaginary friends what all of us do with our grab bags of cultural projects, appreciations, searches, fantasies, casual meetings, old friends, new friends, absent friends, longing, yearning, hoping, disappointments, etc etc.  


Especially like Toíbín's paragraph on the intense and strange coherence of Book of Disquiet

"Zenith’s biography makes clear, in painstaking detail, how random and haphazard Pessoa’s thinking was. Some of his writing is close to outburst, as are some of the poems, especially the ones about Portugal or sex. But The Book of Disquiet is different from his other prose writing. No matter in what order the short sections appear, the book has a strange coherence. It centres on a single idea – that nothing is as it seems, that thinking is not thinking, being is not being, dreaming is not dreaming – and it pursues the implications of all this in a semi-logical way. Its tone is concentrated and engaging, managing to combine a po-faced melancholy with dark laughter.


He goes on and the next paragraph ends in brilliance: "But its power comes from its cumulative effect, the idea that this demented bookkeeper simply will not stop wondering what reality does not mean. Every time Soares appears to have exhausted himself, he begins again, like a man walking in a city, turning corners, looking up at the sky, sitting on a bench, fondling a stray cat, setting off for home before thinking better of it. Reading The Book of Disquiet after reading Zenith’s biography allows us to see that the chaos and lassitude of Pessoa’s life had an undercurrent of discipline and rigour. He had no idea how to make a living; he talked too much, drank too much and wrote too much; his political ideas were often mad; but all the time The Book of Disquiet was emerging, holding a tight space between banality and comedy."


"The book is almost about philosophy; its tone is often casual and then deliberate. Pessoa loves aphorism, and enjoys long, loose ruminations. He writes beautifully about weather; it seems constantly to surprise him. He evokes the city of Lisbon with a nostalgia all the more intense because he has not lost it. Sometimes he is nearly a novelist, managing to make his own quotidian life almost credible and his voice, as he narrates ‘my factless autobiography, my lifeless history’, almost real. What he doesn’t do in ‘my haphazard book of musings’ is relax his control. He can be precise, exact and restrained – like a chess player or a mathematician. But the thinking in the book is almost light. At times, he can make Soares sound like Oscar Wilde (‘I see humanity as merely one of Nature’s latest schools of decorative painting’); at other times, like the J.M. Synge of The Aran Islands, utterly alone in strange weather, trying to make sense of his own solitary condition. Like Synge, he can write simple phrases that do nothing more than say something simple: ‘I love the stillness of early summer evenings downtown.’


I don't think Aciman will come close to Toíbín.  


"The great thing is that the narrator goes on and on, sometimes in plain sentences, at other times using metaphor to describe his plight, or his non-plight, or the space in between:

I’m the suburbs of a non-existent town, the long-winded commentary on a book never written. I’m no one, no one at all. I don’t know how to feel, how to think, how to want. I’m the character of an unwritten novel, wafting in the air, dispersed without having ever been, among the dreams of someone who did not know how to complete me.


"I would favour including the Guedes section, or the best bits of it, as an appendix. And then triumphantly beginning the book in 1930 with Zenith’s first sentence, though it’s slightly better in Jull Costa’s version: ‘I was born at a time when most young people had lost their belief in God for much the same reason that their elders had kept theirs – without knowing why.’"


Have to find Zenith's version—-why would Toíbín announce his quibble with this??  "I was born in a time when the majority of young people had lost faith in God, for the same reason their elders had had it —- without knowing why."  


Is it simply British ears versus American ears?  Most likely.  I sent the question to my review panel and will let you know.  It seems pretty picky to have mentioned it, but maybe T and Jull C are friends?  Or T just wants to score a nit against Zenith because he envies how magnificent a job he has done.  



———


Ed Schwartz

Hi, Just revisiting your section of your Lax book.  So interesting!  Lax's verticality reminds me most of the slow panning of a movie camera that allows the viewer to see things "one inch at a time"  fracturing a greater context (the usual cliches).  And this can be such a great pleasure!  And "one inch at a time" seems the way you did your Lax research.


And just to add:  I think that Lax's sense of verticality can also be found in Williams, Olson


Ed





Hi   Nice to hear from you.   And enjoy all the linkages you're making.  Been thinking about the Lax biography, you haven't read it have you?  Pure Act by MacGregor?  Been looking at all the reviews of the new Richard Zenith biography of Pessoa that are now coming out and wishing Lax could have had a biographer who wasn't a friend and assistant for the last fifteen years

of his life.  McGregor's book is hagiography, alas, because he is too close to his subject and too protective.  Not that Lax's poetry doesn't get good attention, by the human life seems too perfect and too unrevealed, after having read Zenith's reconstruction after many years later and sifting through the massive archive of loose pages!  Distance needed to

do a real biography of a writer.  (Tell Ben to get out there and carefully date and organize all your loose papers in that big trunk of yours!)  


Our house is almost up for rental in a week or so, will send photos.  Wish we were coming out sooner.  Am So REady!!!  Virginia will take a slower, longer time.  Our Parisians are here, this afternoon both kids are in theater productions from the first week of theater day camp.  Very exciting.  


Bob

—-


Hoping for big news on Monday or Tuesday or Wednesday from Eloy.  


Delightful afternoon with the kids seeing their productions after the first week of camp.  Eliot all fierce dance action as the Lion behind the dwarves story of Snow White.  Who knew?  And Emma had a costume change in her quiz show drama and was all ebullience and grace.  


Decided to stop Forgotten Sister at the chapter when Agathe decides to commit suicide.  Now want to dive into the main work and see how this incestuous love affair winds through it.  I can see why Agee wanted to pull it out as a coherent novel in its own right.  And yet . . . . What does Pessoa say?  "‘Never read a book to the end,’ Pessoa tells us, ‘nor even in sequence and without skipping.’


Larry votes for Option 1 because of parallel style:: probably the strunk & white answer, on the money, and one I had not thought of thinking of!!!

I'd go with option #1. The parallelism works better in my humble opinion.


Zenith puts this morsel at the very end of &Co collection.  "“It was in a bibliographical note for the December 1928 issue of Presença, a literary magazine published in Coimbra, that Pessoa dubbed his heteronymic enterprise a “drama divided into people instead of into acts.” The best survey of this enterprise, beginning with the literary companions of Pessoa’s childhood, has been made by Teresa Rita Lopes in her Pessoa por Conhecer, which identifies seventy-two fictional authors invented by Pessoa and examines more closely the “behind-the-scenes writing activity” lightly touched on here. The book’s second volume transcribes Pessoa’s note equating the “self-division of the I” to maturbation (p. 477) as well as the French essay on exhibitionism signed by Jean Seul (pp. 202-6).”


— Fernando Pessoa & Co.: Selected Poems by Fernando Pessoa


He seems to say he didn't see the note himself but is going on Lopes's transcription.  Correct or not?  I think, however, he actually uses it in the biography.  Will check when I get the hardback copy, much easier to use an index than on a kindle.  


Emma went upstairs long ago after ice cream to read Harry Potter in the spare bedroom.  Her mom is watching the Olympics handball tournament.

R-P coached one or more of the players.  


Ed suggested rejecting both versions of the Pessoa sentence!  and says "Don't need Ben for organization.  I have almost organized everything into books."  Occurs to me that his whole notion of inch by inch from movies probably describes his creative methods.  


Sitter has a worthy editorial suggestion—I slightly prefer #1, but in either case I think I'd replace "for much the same reason that" with "much as"


Edward savored the illusion that a new house would generate meaning.  Better to have a specific illusion one could hold and pet than to keep casting about hoping to find one.  


Crisis over the yellow accent in the kitchen.  Eloy mentions in passing on zoom last evening "wallpaper."  We ignored it until 3 am this morning and both said, no, no wallpaper.  Texted him at 6 am and luckily he replied later that the work had not been done and easily canceled.  Phew.  His ac has broken and his dad had a stroke about a week ago.  Plus Denesa wants a break.  He still thinks he can get the photographer in and info up online.  We both said just pull off the big mantle.  He thinks it must not have been original with the house and I suspect that too.  Someday we could ask Chris the previous owner but not now!  


Super hot day again.  Pods are at the beach with the vonmillers.  Call from Katie that Eliot had a bump—wet his pants not getting out of his costume in time, Dave finally texted that he got my text.  Luckily they have dry pants for him at the camp.  


started into the Kendall book on Buber.  did a quick search:  What is Buber's I Thou relationship?

This type of meeting is what Buber described as an I–Thou relationship. The I–Thou relationship is characterized by mutuality, directness, presentness, intensity and ineffability. Buber described the between as a bold leap into the experience of the other while simultaneously being transparent, present and accessible.  


could I dare suggest Pessoa fits the bill even though it seems he doesn't?  

look at Toibin's passage again Zenith’s biography makes clear, in painstaking detail, how random and haphazard Pessoa’s thinking was. Some of his writing is close to outburst, as are some of the poems, especially the ones about Portugal or sex. But The Book of Disquiet is different from his other prose writing. No matter in what order the short sections appear, the book has a strange coherence. It centres on a single idea – that nothing is as it seems, that thinking is not thinking, being is not being, dreaming is not dreaming – and it pursues the implications of all this in a semi-logical way. Its tone is concentrated and engaging, managing to combine a po-faced melancholy with dark laughter.




“The beauty, the simplicity, the invaluable significance of Buber’s insightful response to this question fuels this book. The heart center of genuine dialogue cannot be found within one or the other of its participants. Neither does it equal the sum total of their input. Rather, it emerges from the oscillating sphere between and around them. Thereby, according to Buber, dialogue’s center is the immediate presence of reciprocal interhuman mutuality among dialogical partners, from which each person’s unique identity emerges.”


— Martin Buber’s Dialogue: Discovering Who We Really Are by Kenneth Paul Kramer


how much better the language of love in Plato---

save us from mechanistic inputs and oscillating spheres for goodness sake or it sounds like better living through electricity!! 


I'm guessing Buber's move from Kabbalistic mysticism to dialogue replicates Jewish thought discovering Greek, from the decalogue to Plato's dialogues.  

Kramer's lifelong excitement and vocational calling also replicates the Socrates-Plato-Aristotle narrative:  the student who falls in love with the teacher, and the student's student who falls in love with the student of the teacher.  I.E. the universal pattern found in all sorts of variants.  And what we all are looking form in one form or another, over and over.  But Kramer's language in this one passage to which I grumped suggests again that academics cannot be expected to write as well as poets.  


this Buber passage I like much and it echoes Plato perfectly —- and lots more

"I do not accept any absolute formulas for living . . . No preconceived code can see ahead to everything that can happen in a [person’s] life. As we live, we grow, and our beliefs change. They must change. So I think we could live with this constant discovery. We should be open to this adventure in heightened awareness of living. We should stake our whole existence on our willingness to explore and experience.”


— Martin Buber’s Dialogue: Discovering Who We Really Are by Kenneth Paul Kramer


Relief that we've had the second theater production.  Emma thought the upper camp dance production was super.  She's now reading Harry upstairs on the bed.  Eliot and Emma watching baseball on Olympics.   Dave out buying corn and scallops for dinner.  


19 August  Thursday


Heavy steady rain day from storm Fred.  Everyone spread out through the house in lazy rainy day mode.  After noon.  Dave researching parking for the big Portland festival outing Saturday evening.  Before that they can go for covid tests needed for the flight back.  


27 August


Hanover today to see the dermatologist.  Dropped shorts at Erin's and got to see the new Airedale, Hobbs.  Pete needed a dog he would not be allergic to.  $2300 from a breeder!  Super cute.  We lunched at the famous Stella's.  Amazing quality of bread and croissants and cookie.  Why have we waited so long to go there?  Message from Crystal Luna that our car is on the lot.  She sent a picture of it.  I've chatted with the pharmacist at CVS about his blue Tesla, which he loves, has had for almost four years.  Lives in Campton. The house is empty once more.  Everyone is at Plessis.  Sure sign of recovery is C wanted a photo of the label on the wine Mickey had given them.  It is a special domaine and type of rosé.  I called the seller on the label but they are a wholesale dealer only.  Online searching revealed it sold for about 12-14 dollars, so it must be seasonal only but not that pricey.  


I folded the plastic green cheque tablecloth a few more turns onto itself.  Slow reconfiguring of the house after the visit.  Erin and Pete and I Bonded over Lems shoes!!!!  Major event of the day.  Pete likes Ultra shoes too.  Have to look them up.  Looks like he means Altra—-zero drop running shoes with super wide toe box.  I've used those once long ago in the past. Maybe he works on his feet a lot and likes the cushioning.  Erin works in the house and around the barnyard, so Lems perfect.  Just speculating.  Getting more into Musil.  


And now Iyer who uses "creative writing as spiritual exercise" as the subtitle of his zoom lectures.  Listening now to one on Youtube and he will give another soon next week for Va Tech [!]  He starts with a quote from Beckett in an interview for a French journal—-


—I never read philosophy.

—Why not?

—I don't understand it.

[. . . ]

—Why did you write your books?

—I don't know.  I'm not an intellectual.  I just feel things.  I invented Molloy and the rest on the day I understood how stupid I'd been.  I began then to write down the things I feel.  


then he quotes an early 20th C French writer but I can't see the name—Pierre Adolph?  and then David Kishik—-Autophilosophy  and Marcus Aurelius—so spiritual exercise means activity as a form of life, a way of living.   Pierre Hadot is the French philosopher.  Stoics.  Spiritual Exercises as living.   Amor Fati—-Love of Fate.    Skimming through his video it seems he is still too much under the influence of Nietzsche!!  Still working through Nietzsche's hangover on him.  His talk doesn't feel as light and humorous as the book itself did.  Unless I was misreading it.  Which I was, since all reading is misreading.  etc.  


If I were to read Aurelius then I should read Plotinus as well.  “The purification of the Soul is simply to allow it to be alone; it is pure when it keeps no company.”

― Plotinus, The Enneads      The Belgian tv drama about Professor T quoted Plotinus   


My ignorance is unlimited so far as authors I've not read so why bother?  They are all reinventing all of it over and over and I don't really need to keep tracking them around and around.  Iyer seems to be overdoing what he's now doing.  He had his burst of creative fire and the books resulting were delightful fun.  At first.  In the latest he got entangled and lost some mojo.  It was no longer the fun of the books up to Wittgenstein.  Nietzsche has done him in, as Nietzshe seems wont to do.  Have never read him!  That's probably a good thing.  Even a great thing.  


Just talked with Anne.  They drove to Mobile today to get away from hurricane Ida.  


Google you are divine!  "What should I eat at night to burn fat?

12 Best Bedtime Foods for Weight Loss

  1. Greek Yogurt. Greek yogurt is like the MVP of yogurts, thanks to its high protein and low sugar content (in unsweetened varieties). ...
  2. Cherries. ...
  3. Peanut butter on whole grain bread. …

today feels so gray and hyper-calm, the penumbra of the hurricane hovering over.  Ok, "penumbra" pretentious but what a fine word and how much fun it was to allow it in even if it ruins my true style.  


The Present Alone is our Happiness—-Pierre Hadot  Philosophical discourse as spiritual exercise.  

Daniel Fraser's essay Force and Circumstance, on Bernhard—-Yorkshire person. Editor @readysteadybook. Writer @thequietus, @3ammagaine, @gorse_journal, @LAReviewofBooks + more. Communism, literature, philosophy.



John Sitter to Phil   "he's not burdened by modesty"

Hi, Phil.   I have to say I've sorta read it.  I listened to it and then did what I sometimes to, borrowed the library copy long enough to look up a few parts that had interested me particularly. There were enough of those that I then listened to some of his Homo Deus, I was very impressed by his range and clarity. Have to say he is not burdened by modesty. But his assurance seems pretty well earned.  Unfortunately, I don't have your commendable habit of keeping good reading notes.  As I look back & find the one sentence I have, it's to the effect that Homo Deus would make a good oppositional pairing in a course with Bill McKibben's Falter, which is lot more skeptical regarding "progress" than Harari's book (HD, i.e.). I look forward to learning more about what you think of Sapiens.


         —John


Hi Bob,


Yes, I want to read the Zenith biography of Pessoa. I've been an admirer of Pessoa since the early 90s, when Quartet brought out a great edition of the Book of Disquiet. May try writing something like that - or rather, editing what I've already written. 


>I'm worried that Nietzsche has discombobulated you!!  You seem unduly anxious?  Missing the lightness of the three

earliest of your books.  But talking/teaching is not writing . . . .  Rich gathering of texts and voices, fully delightful.  


Heidegger said that Nietzsche broke him ... I've been sent nearly mad by the last 18 months ... the next novel shows that near-madness even more than N +tBs. I don't anticipate a return to the lightness of the first three novels for the moment ...


Best,

Lars


found this "Bernhard as a reader of Musil. "  website on Michael W Jennings at Princeton

he seems not to have written or published on this topic—-

from an article by Thomas McGonigle in the Chicago Tribune about B's last work, Extinction—which I have read, imbibed, but clearly I knew too little about German lit to get it all — Bernhard, through Murau, clearly establishes his ambition. First, he sets out to demolish Goethe, then Robert Musil and Thomas Mann:

" produced thoroughly lower-middle-class works, I told Gambetti, addressed to lower-middle-class readers who fall upon them with gusto. For at least a hundred years we've had nothing but . . . lower-middle-class bureaucratic writing, and the masters of this literature are Musil and Thomas Mann, to say nothing of the others. The one exception is of course Kafka, who actually was a bureaucrat, though he didn't write bureaucratic works, but none of the others could write anything else. Kafka, the bureaucrat, was the only one who produced not bureaucratic literature but great literature."  By centering the novel so completely on Murau, Bernhard does perform one great sleight of hand: he endows Murau with the force of autobiographical pain, rant and authority, though from what is known of Bernhard's life, its outward circumstances bear little relation to those of his creation."  

I guess Musil was not an INFP!—-"After the Enlightenment most of us lost courage. A minor failure was enough to turn us away from reason, and we allowed every barren enthusiast to inveigh against the intentions of a d'Alembert or a Diderot as mere rationalism. We beat the drums for feeling against intellect and forgot that without intellect... feeling is as dense as a blockhead (dick wie ein Mops ist)."  wiki  

Why then read him?  He was born in 1880!  Am I looking for my grandfather?  Dad born in 1915 so his father could have been then 35 which is pretty old for those days?  or not.  Proust born in 1871, Kenneth Burke in 1897.  Bernhard born in 1931, year after Musil's book published.  

Maybe like reading Conrad, even Melville.  Flight from the present chaos.