Friday, February 02, 2018

January 2018

2018  

January 2

night.  Beautiful full moon right up there out this window.  Much warmer today and next few days.  A week ago I went over to Peterborough and had a great time and found a good massage.  Today I went to Woburn.  It was ok but not as good as last week.  The aromatherapy was the best I’ve ever had---a lavender mist that seemed to have come through a mask over the nose, strong and moist and quite a pleasant addition.  And yet the whole production was all the bells and whistles of a Boston suburban place and yet none of, or very little of, the human warmth found in Peterborough.  Rafa did give me a tip on a good dermatologist in Burlington, MA, Dr Ellerin.  Just looked up his site and might look into going to see him if Dr Fagan will refer. 

The most amazing part of the trip today was the house itself in Wobun, right off 93.  Ordinary suburban street, houses all alike.  Park in the driveway and walk around to a side entrance, in through the garage, and then into a small suite with massage room.  It all looked so incredibly familiar, afterwards.  Driving up 93 after I became absolutely certain that I had been there before.  Maybe ten or twelve years ago, a year or so after Virginia’s event.  I would put money on it.  Rafa says he’s only been there under two years so he has no knowledge of the history of the house.  That small suite might have been a grandparents’ wing, a rental unit or whatever, but it definitely works well as a consulting space.  Maybe a therapist. Lots of possible uses for it.  Leaving the house I began to feel that sense that, yes, I had been there once before.  Even the corner of the two streets with names of apples--Granny Smith and Cortland.  All so familiar.  Like a perfect dream-memory.  Imagined?  Liminal?  Perhaps. 

Decided Jim’s fable is about his Parkinsons.  Twice he uses his old religious brotherhood name--Dennis Andrew.  Denis Andre the woodworker and Denise the ugly bitch who Cadeau redeems at the end and gives to her her first experience of beauty that takes her out of herself.  She is the ugly self-centered, egotistical, blind grabber who lives in all of us.  Why Jim divides his story into a battle between true and false nuns, etc, remains a puzzle.  Perhaps some French fables impressed him way back.  Is he echoing something in Les Mis?  etc  Not sure of any of that.  A teaching fable so far as grace and the monsters life invites us to live with, superb spirituality, clarity and gentle grace and gracefulness.  And yet the density of the writing and the treatment of women give me pause.  Who should I suggest read it?  Would I?  I’m really afraid it could offend people under fifty who are not familiar with Catholic spiritual and social teaching.  Would the Ebner family enjoy it?  Two generations of devout Catholics there.  Maybe three. 

Had some French culture on in the car.  A bit of Modiano later.  Deep into Énard’s novel and loving it.  France, Paris, French everything has been thrust upon me.  Slowly at first but now whole hog.  I still revert to the notion of doing only Proust for a year or more, spoken, read, wallowed in.  With Modiano too.  French prose.  Until it feels second-nature-esque, or as close as possible after a year or so. 

December 4  Thursday 

Big snow coming and day for making the Kings bread/cake.  Pressure on. 

Dec 6  Saturday evening

Fine dinner last night.  News from Mexico that Rick seems quite sick.  Roy going down tomorrow, thank goodness.  Petie flys to London on Tuesday, Ray working on Bower House.  1726 house.  “Pemberly”

Sunday 7 Dec

Temperatures are up, sunny day.  Drove to Concord for Target and then lunch at Olive Garden.  Dozed at the Meredith exit gas station, home by barely light on the horizon, beautiful sunset over the ridge. 

note from Petr Skavaril in Prague from Dec 29  Did I already copy it out?
If not, here it is. 

Dear Bob,

Hope you and Virgina are well enjoying snowy Christmas holidays. Thank you for your kind letter and the CD of your son's music. I'm very sorry to respond only now. I kept your package on my desk waiting for a quiet moment to listen to the CD. The last weeks of the year were very busy with travel and work and I finally got my quiet evening only a few days ago.

I used to spend countless evenings and late nights at jazz clubs during my studies (a lot of my friends back home are musicians) and I even used to live right next to the best jazz bar in town when I moved to Prague. I don't get to go quite as often as I used to but your son's music (which I really enjoyed) was a very pleasant reminder. It would be great to see his band play live one day. I'll let you know if/when my travels take me to Paris next!

You're right about Nicholas. I feel very fortunate to have gotten to know him. He is one of the most inspiring and kind people I get to work with and talk to. Thank you again for your generous words about our trip. I very much enjoyed it too and often remember it. The world is indeed small enough that there is a good chance we'll see each other again. I think it's actually quite likely I may go to Boston in the next year or two. I'll let you know! And, of course, if you plan a trip to Europe or even Prague, please let me know. We'd be very happy to host you and Virginia.

My wife Klara (Greta is our daughter's name but well done remembering it!) found our connection via Vivobarefoot and her unexpected role in it amusing. And I find your story to be, in fact, very encouraging! See, I've been a very passionate mountain biker since the day I could ride a bike. And I still really love that sport. I just haven't been able to ride as regularly as I'd like to (and need to, really) and I can't bring a bike with me when I travel. So I've tried running on and off and while I enjoy it, I guess I still have many more miles to run before it becomes a passion. Let's see, maybe your story and the footwear we share will make that journey a few miles shorter.

I wish you and Virginia a wonderful end of the year. May both of you carry the incredible energy and zest for life I had a chance to experience a little bit on our trip into the New Year and beyond.

Warm regards,

Petr
----------

recent email said he might get to Boston sometime soon. 

We went to Nashua today.  Biryani Pot restaurant not as good as we’d hoped.   Walking was good.  Back of my mind I’m composing my response letter to Aciman, send it off later in the week.  Va and Petie and Roy taking care of Rick’s return to Abq and health crisis.  He and Marci fly there on Saturday. 

Tuesday 9 January

5pm   Trip to White River Jct today.  Splendid sky over and back.  Skies.  Changing, sun, clouds, colors, grays, blues.  Fine visit with Jt and most relaxing.  Some new techniques.  Effective.  Wonderful.  Lunch at Thyme which is new name for what used to be Tip-top.  Piecemeal Pies just closed for the week.  Town looked snowy and grungy, brilliant whites, faded clapboard, old brick.  Big new building going up though.  Countryside along Rt 5 beautiful.  Can see what Carole means when she says she still would rather live in VT. 

Thursday night  Jan 11 

Sleepy start to the day.  Much warmer and getting rainy.  We finished watching the French tv netflix show.

-------
Friday morning  Jan 12

Talked with Anne last night for her 68th birthday. 

----to Phil
thanks  a brilliant, brilliantly funny, searing, piece  ---- and yet,

we can only return to our desperate wailing--how the fuck do we get
this guy into the trash bin and seal the top? 

we got into watching a French crime drama on Netflix and even after it
got worse and worse we stayed until the bitter end to see how it would
end (the serial killer mom and her son finally smile and have a redemptive
hug).  In one scene the monster abusive father finally gets it and we
see in the background how he goes out of the chateau into the back
yard, climbs up onto the edge of the well, takes off the heavy metal
lid and then jumps in.  It has become for us now one of the funniest
things we've ever seen on bad tv/movies.  Inadvertently so, I guess, or
just lots of dumb things going on in all these not-bad (terrible) shows
we're flooded with. 

Petri's piece is so good---but the yahoos around the prez and "his supporters"
can't get what her piece is even about and could care less. 

Arizona congressman on radio this morning defending the prez's shithole
comment.  He tells things like they is. 

Was there an alligator character in Al Capp's cartoon world? 

Really warm today and raining like crazy.  Below zero again tomorrow night! 

-------------


Yes, of course. But "in common" surely misapprehends the whole situation and the whole of everything. 
Asks the question that misunderstands everything about people before the question
even finishes hanging in the air.  (sounds like a phrase from James or something!)

Any long-term relationship seems to move far beyond the real and imaginary bonds
that might have started it eons ago.  I think aging itself moves us into these strange zones
of incomprehension.  I hear it in Leonard Cohen's later songs.  "How lonely does it get,
Hank Willaims hasn't answered yet" in "Tower of Song" I think.  At the same time
we become more and more grateful or just resigned and accepting of having someone,
anyone, "around."  Sounds like a cat or dog, maybe.  But even that is ok.  Beingness,
life with life, isn't this the gray gravel patterns of those famous Japanese zen gardens? 

You and Peg don't "have" a bucket list or a life list of "in common" anythings.  Years
of being with each other through multitude of unreal moments.  Even if we want to
ask well what does even "with" mean?  Let's go microwave a cup of soup! 

A disturbing question:  I had lunch with a guy I attended Brown with.  He and I reconnected about a year ago.  He is now a retired lawyer who lives in northern Virginia.   During lunch he asked me what I had in common with Peg.   I was hard pressed to come up with anything.  Have you had any experience like this?   it's sobering to say the least.

P
-------

Jan 12. 2018

Dear André,

Back to our most important agenda item, let’s get together.  Did Dartmouth come through with the offer of a summer course on Proust?  That would be ideal for me because then we could have more than one lunch.  We will clearly need more since our topic will be both persons we each like least. 

If Dartmouth does offer, do not sign the contract until there is a clause guaranteeing you both air conditioned housing and an air conditioned seminar or class room.  In spite of appearances, Hanover can be astonishingly, miserably, hot and humid for more than a few days in the summer Quarter. 

I’m glad you didn’t invite me to the Century Club and turned it down.  The brother of a friend up here was president at one time (André Bernard), and what little I have heard about him would make me not so interested in that outfit. 

Winter snows envelope us deeply at the moment.  Getting down to the city,
your city, is not that easy for me especially in this season.  Once we survive mud season and hear rumors of flowers in locales further south, travel becomes more possible.  You might want to come north, too, as far as Middletown, CT, or even Boston, to wander the Gardner Museum.  April 15 they hang the nasturtiums in the courtyard for Isabel’s birthday and we try to get down to see them as a ritual marker for the hope of summer.

I’m re-reading Enigma V, slowly.  I should start a private glossary of those phrases and places where the prose speaks directly into my secret places no one can know about.  Poisoning minds indeed.  You mentioned you continue to work on the essays on misreading.  Yes, I look forward to those for sure.  And yet, for me, the fiction is where the teller’s inward voice entices me to admissions and unravels tangles I thought no one else could know about.  Conrad’s great story, “The Secret Sharer.”  Isn’t that reading in its greatest pleasures?   Writing too? 

I marked up heavily page after page of  Eight White Nights, when I first read it and I will go back for a much more slow reading some time.  Given the great success of Call Me right now I have to wonder if, even if no one ever finishes reading Eight, you say, has anyone yet bought the movie rights to it??  The book describes
glorious winter nights in the city so beautifully, I can see the images on screen. 

Bob
---------

Telephone chat with Dick about their trip to France in April  

We booked the Panama trip this morning!  woo hoo

“Secrecy, love, guilt, we could glimpse their source.  And if I wrote this grave and solemn text when I got back to Vienna it’s probably to record them in turn, as much as to rediscover, through prose, the presence of Sarah who had gone -- plunged into mourning, overwhelmed--to confront her sadness in Paris.  What a strange sensation, rereading yourself.  An aging mirror.  I am attracted and repulsed by this former self as by another.  A first souvenir, inserted between memory and me.  A diaphanous leaf of paper that light passes through to outline other images on it.  A stained-glass window.  I is in the night.  Being exists always in this distance, somewhere between an unfathomable self and the other in oneself.  In the sensation of time.  In love, which is the impossibility of fusion between self and other.  In art, the experience of otherness.     357  of Compass 

Nice passage.  Aciman might like it. 

Now we have this project to construct and execute for the spring and another for the fall. 

-------letter actually sent----
Jan 12. 2018

Dear André,

Back to our most important agenda item, let’s get together.  Did Dartmouth come through with the offer of a summer course on Proust?  That would be ideal for me because then we could have more than one lunch.  We will clearly need more since our topic will be both persons we each like least. 

If Dartmouth does offer, do not sign the contract until there is a clause guaranteeing you both air conditioned housing and an air conditioned seminar or class room.  In spite of appearances, Hanover can be astonishingly, miserably, hot and humid for more than a few days in the summer Quarter. 

I’m glad you didn’t invite me to the Century Club and turned it down.  The brother of a friend up here was president at one time (André Bernard), and what little I have heard about him would make me not so interested in that outfit. 

Winter snows envelope us deeply at the moment.  Getting down to the city is not that easy for me especially in this season.  Once we survive mud season and hear rumors of flowers, travel becomes more possible.  You might want to come north, too, as far as Middletown, CT, or even Boston, to wander the Gardner Museum.  April 15 they hang the nasturtiums in the courtyard for Isabel’s birthday and we try to get down to see them as a ritual marker for the hope of summer.

I’m re-reading Enigma V, slowly.  I should start a private glossary of those phrases and places where the prose speaks directly into my interior places no one could know about.  Poisoning minds indeed.  You mentioned you continue to work on the essays on misreading.  Yes, I look forward to those for sure.  And yet, for me, the fiction is where the teller’s inward voice entices me to admissions and unravels tangles I didn’t know could be revealed.  Conrad’s great story, “The Secret Sharer.”  Isn’t that reading in its greatest pleasures?   Writing too? 

I marked up page after page of  Eight White Nights, when I first read it and I will go back for a much more slow reading.  Has anyone bought the movie rights to it??  The book describes glorious winter nights in the city so beautifully, I can see the images on screen. 

Bob
---------

Sunday  14 January

Roy called from Abq.  Settling in.  Rick needed lots of pain shots before and for the trip.  What are “pain shots?”

Bright and sunny. 

Monday  Jan 15   MLK

“in his own impasse, in that aporia, between self and other, which is identity.”  374
Énard  

or between self, other and other, which is identity--according to Aciman and Garlitz

Rupert’s essay on his poetry and life has all the authority and stance of an encyclical from the vatican.  A statement of position and dogma, fragmentation as the faith of poets and writers at the turn of the millenium.  And now our 45th parodies this faith a hundred times a day. 

Bed in this room cleaned off at last.  A new day dawns.  Now that we have two cruises ahead of this year, we will sail onward with no hitches.  Sunshine today looked wonderful. 

Énard:  “Bethege, an almost motionless traveler who knew no Arabic, no Persian, no Chinese.  The original, the essence, remains between the text and his translations, in a land between languages, between worlds, somewhere in the nako-djaabad, the nowhere-place, that imagined world where music also takes its source.  There is no original.  Everything is in flux.  Between languages.  Between times, the time of Hafez and that of Hans Bethge.  Translation as metaphysical practice.  Translation as meditation.  It’s very late to be thinking of these things.  The memory of Sarah and music pushes me to these melancholies.  These wide spaces of the vacuity of time.”      398

Énard born in ’72.  So he is the generation after Loydell and in his work we see what has come, is here, after the dogmas of fragmentation.  The new school of faith in betweenness.  Aciman part of it, elder statesman for it?  The apophasis of translation.  Of shifting from language to language with no belief that an essence will be found and can never be carried from one to another.  Flux transcends fragmentation.  Flux precedes fragmentation.  Flux contains all fragments.  Fragmentation assumes flux.  Flux subsumes fragmentation. 

Tuesday  16 Jan

Hmm.  Seem to have reinvented Heraclitus up there.  With Énard’s prompting.  Day off today and nowhere to go.  Snow late this afternoon and evening but it feels like snow now.  Gray, pale white skies. 

The long history of French in my life that has brought me to the point of trying each day to read Proust and Modiano and Énard (perhaps) in French.  When and where did I first hear about French?  Probably the movies.  Gigi and on television and where else?  Ursuline sisters and sisters of Charity who took care of me in the hospital when I had the tonsilectomy.  They wore the big sail hats from Breton.  But did I even know then that they were French?  I don’t think so.  Did I hear them speak French?  No.  Somehow mother talked about the Ursuline sisters so much that I always thought her parish was a French parish, but I heard lots of Church Latin but have no clear memory of hearing anyone speak French.  In high school we had German and Latin.  Not until college did I start some study of French but in the novitiate at Ammendale, that was the immersion in Frenchness.  The history of the order, of the founder, St LaSalle, and of the spiritual reading we were given.  Old style French spiritual practices.  Perhaps the most consciously “first” notion of doing some French was the book by Dechanet about Christian Yoga.  I knew that it was a book translated from French and that he was a French monk who was promoting yoga and a desirable way to be both christian and a monk.  As an aid to prayer and the interior life.  Had I read Dickens novel about the revolution in high school?  Maybe.  Maybe I read it later in college.  In French classes we were supposed to be able to read Camus’s L’Etranger but I felt hardly conscious at that time, those two years were traumatic years, culminating in the two short spells in the mental hospital the second year.  I didn’t like trying to study French, it was like trying to study mathematics.  How did I ever pass the course on beginning calculus or the two courses on French.  I did purchase, however, the Jerusalem Bible, one copy in French and one in British translation.  That copy I think I gave to Feeny.  The French copy is still on the bookshelf downstairs!  That bible was at the time the fruit of what was considered the most advanced study of the bible in light of the most advanced studies of archaeology in that post-war period.  A scholar at La  Salle was considered one of the leading students of biblical archaeology in Catholic circles at that time.  When I got to Maryland did I buy them?  Or in Chicago?  Talismans of the previous monastic life and of the desire to be with it in advanced Catholic studies.  Énard could have put into his novel the Orientalism of the Roman church.  My experience of that was the shrine in Washington where the Eastern mosaics introduced me to the whole Orientalist world of orthodox Christianity and of Eastern art in general.  Little or no comprehension of all of that at the time, but exposure. 

Just opened his book at my bookmark and there the next paragraph to read on 405 is about the Catholic missionaries to the East.  Orientalist scholars translate and import and missionaries translate and export.  Both Orientalists creating eastern realities as they wish them to be.  He calls it, this imagined fourth volume, the encyclopaedia of the decapitated.  That resonates with our own local martyr of a few years back, our college dean’s grandson.  Foley.  Trained by the Jesuits at Marquette.  The war photographer. 

Opened Enigma to page 119 and there is one of Aciman’s bold passages and I see now I sort of missed it when I first read the book maybe a year ago, or more now.  Such a fine scene on the terrace of the Plums, Maud and Gabi and Paolo, our narrator, in a delicate and tender and sort of violent, muted, entanglement.  Just the sort Aciman loves, needs.  The three way.  If he is writing essays on misreading, he will need to make the three-way structure the key to all of it.  The not-key.  Is he conscious of the role of the trinity in Western thought?  Should I even ask him that?  He is not Leonard Cohen and yet growing up in Alexandria and Rome, oh, he has to have his christian theology tucked into one side of his belt. 

Annemarie Schwarzenbach
-------
That foto is funny cuz i was trying out the timer on the camera my ex gave me, alil point and shoot thingy , but nice in its own way.
When i realized how simple it was to do a selfie i took that 2nd photo, the one on the site, and just nailed it for me anyways and others seem to agree!

i think the lighting is ironic in that its so classicall rembrandt or vermeer-esque in that it lights the volume of me fr om the side and the
opposite side is dark.

It was nice to send a mssg out into the world and get a response.
Thanks for taking a look and your comments.

Sincerely, Andy!

Andy St Martin   

How many of us say that, would say that,

Finished Énard’s novel.  Novel?  Dissertation recast as delirious lamentation-ecstatic ejaculation.  Well, longish, so nightmare-dream-hallucination.  Was he taking opium?  Probably meant to seem so.  An opium dream. 

Lunch at the new place in Bristol.  Mexican.  Stools only.  Good tortilla soup and huge piece of tres leches cake.  Good but too big.  Small group of students from New Hampton dazzled by the making by hand at their table of guacamole. 

Post office and then a nap.  Was nice to read for a long stretch. 

Alex Aciman has a piece in the Times.  Kirsten sent it thinking it was André.

my comment on it---
piece seemed ehh ok.  Invoking Dreyfus
seemed to me to be way out of scale.  But
maybe I don’t know.  Seems to me as a
30 year old raised in activist nyc jewishness
Alex wants to tell his MyStory.  Not sure his
analysis of France is that clear.

Phil replying to

Thanks for sending that article.   For me it really gave a back-story to Aciman's book about his family in Alexandria.   It also made me realized that I should have asked myself waaaay before now  why all those Jews in British-run Alexandria dreamt of Paris and not London or Vienna or Rome.  Well now we know.   French Jews put together a big  cultural organization to attract them.  And it obviously worked on families such as Aciman's.   (I'm thinking it was less successful with rug merchants.)  As for Alex's assessment of the present.   He's probably right about some areas of France and not so right about other areas.  As you say, 'eeh okay.'   I think the closer one lives to the big urban areas with large ethnic slums filled with resentful third worlders the worse it will be, and if one's standard is perfectionism - "I should be able to go anywhere in this country I want and do whatever I want'  that ain't ever gonna be achieved in France or, likely, anywhere else.   Then again isn't the entire Jewish schtick to demand perfection of the world  and then be disappointed when it's not achieved......P 

----------

Over an hour on speaker phone with Rick Evans about the money.  Skim the top of the bull market now and put plans into place for more conservative rebalancing to be safer for when it crashes.

Thurs 18th

Aciman’s reply yesterday --well it was two days ago, the 16--had not noticed his noted about typos courtesy of iPhone until now. 

Dear Bob,

I'm going to disappoint you.  Dartmouth was unable to offer me a summer gig; instead they offered me a semester (or almost a semester) in one of the coming two years, and I had to turn down this offer because the salary did not match a half-year salary for my title at CUNY. So the courtship is up in the air, which is a pity since I had a terrific time during my week at Montgomery House.

Now we should find a way to meet. I wanted to write an essay on Pessoa, and i have loads of notes on the subject.  My problem is time. I am travelling almost all of February bad then in May I have to go to Australia, to say nothing of the Proust I need to reread for my seminar which starts in the coming two weeks!  I forget everything, always have.

What you say about 8 White Nights and Enigma pleases me no end.  I may have mentioned that 8WN is my favorite book, even though no one reads it.  Strange, isn't it? 

Write back soon.

Andre

On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:13 AM, Aciman, Andre wrote:


André
Typos courtesy iPhone

-----------
So far my reply is “Well, disappointment for now, but I am sure the meeting will happen, we know not when.  Much more disappointed if you publish your Pessoa essay and the title is not “Where I Place Pessoa on the Garlitz Apophasis Scale and All the Reasons Why.”  Or something like that. 

Lots of notes on Pessoa.  Are you reading him in Portuguese, French, English, (Zenith or Jull Costa)?  Or all of these?  

Yes you had said both points about 8WN.  Why is it your favorite?  You said you wrote it for yourself and does it feel like you are having the fun with it you most enjoy writing?  Why does no one finish it?  That is curious.  Most people probably can’t say?

Indulge me here:  I harbor the notion that CMBYN sprang from a short seed passage, maybe a paragraph or two, maybe a sub-chapter, in an early draft of Egypt, and you or someone said, this experience, right here, you should take that out and save it and expand it later into its own full perfection.  ?  Good hunch or am I way off the mark? 

Maybe something similar for Harvard Square as well?  That book needs a bit more commentary, but we’ll save that for later.  My first year of grad study at Chicago I lived in International House on 59th Street and I met a handful of Kalaj’s who have long stayed in my memory.  Lost and wandering students and “students” who came from all over the globe.  1968

Stay busy

----
20 Jan   Sat 

Above not yet sent.  Today we decided to go ahead with the Bali to Bankok Viking trip for 2019.  2 for 1 pricing got us.  And carpe diem. 

To try to visit NYC to see Aciman?  earlier today I thought yes.  Now not so sure.  Better see Jim for his 80th this spring. ? 
21 Jan  Sunday night

sending off the reply to André.  Now I think I will make no promises about trying to get down to the city.  Could be a waste of everything. 

sent

Dear André

Yes, disappointed but then did I expect anything other than that?

Much more disappointed if you publish your Pessoa essay and the title is not “Where I Place Pessoa on the Garlitz Apophasis Scale and All the Reasons Why.”  Or something like that. 

"Lots of notes on Pessoa."  Are you reading him in Portuguese, French, English, (Zenith or Jull Costa)?  Or all of these?  

Yes you had said both points about 8WN.  Why is it your favorite?  You said you wrote it for yourself.  You had most pleasure in writing it?
Why does no one finish it?  That is strange.  Most people probably can’t say?  What is the most common reason why? 

Indulge me here:  I harbor the notion that CMBYN sprang from a short passage, maybe a paragraph or two, maybe a sub-chapter, in an early draft of Egypt, and you or someone said, this experience, right here, you should take that out and save it and expand it later into its own full perfection.  ?  Good hunch or am I way off the mark? 

If I get your schedule, March and April could be open and then when you get back from Australia, late May onward?  I'll be gone first two weeks of May.

More important to write back.  Soon.  I like that as the best way to close off, for now.

Bob
----------

Hi Jim---

Is Cadeau launched yet as a book between covers?  Looked for it on
amazon but not up there yet. 

What a pure gem it is.  Enjoyed much reading the copy you sent electronically.
Now want to spread the news a bit.  The three Denises must be the key--
the craftsman, the reclaimed Denise and that fellow mentioned in the author's
note after.  Beautifully written, intricate and intense with lots of different kinds
of flashes---wit, humor, insight, brilliance, yearning and peace. 

Am I loading it down with too many notes?  Alas, I am more Salieri to your Mozart.

Bob

---------




I',m leaving for Toronto tomorrow morning then coming back to a full schedule of things, especial with classes starting.  Then by Feb 16 I leave for Midwest and west coast for two weeks and am back possibly by March 5th. Here in NYC until very very late April ad early may,  when I head out to Sydney and Melbourne.  Then there's Italy in late June and possibly Brazil in August.  After which I will probably meet my maker.

CMBYN started with the first page one morning when I just wanted to stop writing 8WN.  It inspired me and I kept writing it.

As for why 8WN is still my favourite, with Enigma ranking second, that requires a single malt which I'd gladly offer you at the Hudson Hotel Bar when we find a moment..

André

----------


Two more texts to add in here and then I’m done being in the admirer entourage!

I like what he says about Proust in a piece on favorite books for a Toronto wesite---
"Marcel Proust essentially told me it was OK to keep looking into your heart and your psyche because that's where we spend most of our time anyway.”

but then about five or six years ago in an interview--
What is a distinctive habit or affectation of yours?
I tolerate lots of people I have no patience or respect for. Then, as soon as I can, I rat on them.
--------
not that I would be one of those he has no respect for---but why say that sort of thing in an interview at all---surely some other affectation or habit would have served as well for a reply and even served better.  “person I like least” also gives us a clue to how impossible he might be in person even having a friendly drink or lunch. 
Monday 22 January all of the above
In The Fugitive Albertine has just died.  Wonderful passages.  Reading very slowly, sometimes looking at the French just to see how it looks and feels. 
short note from Jim about his book ---
Launched? Almost! A single block to be knocked out, and then down the  ways she goes!

The one block: They’re still tinkering with the cover but are close to done. Looks like a maiden voyage next month,  matey!

Don’t worry about loading me down with notes! Like you, I’m an unreformed formalist and delight the  links you uncover. (Not many of us left, but too bad for the rest. I’d say “Screw ‘em!” or worse, but I’m still working at being a
Quaker.)

Thanks for your cherished encouragement, cherished friend.

J. Sam’l, aka Denis Andrew

----------

better to go see him in May 

thing is, Paolo in Enigma has just said how he envies Manfred as he watches him from the stands on the court in front of him.  “I envied you.”  143

Have not yet said to André that it is this direct admission of envy that distinguishes his work beyond any other writer I’ve ever read.  And which bonds me to Paolo more closely than to any other narrator to whom I’ve felt close.  Identical. 

23 January  Tuesday

Day off.  Up and down the highway in freezing rain, near freezing rain.  Heavy rain.  Didn’t make it to Phillip the acupuncturist in Lawrence.  Texted cancel from Hooksett.  Bought a book on the paintings in Proust and the older translation of the Prisoner and Fugitive.  Big breakfast at the rest stop diner and later a small salad at the Coop.  Just realized I didn’t have an afternoon tea but now I think I’ll skip it, see how sleep goes.  Jackfruit at Whole Foods, the taqueria stand.  Vegan filler the young fellow said.  We’ll see how it goes down.  Also “grain free” tortilla chips!  Cassava. ! 

Can see why Enigma is A’s second favorite book.  I can envy him his books, his writing.  But I could never write them even though I can imagine “I could have” or I resent that he has “stolen” the books I “should have” written.  But they are beyond my capacities, beyond not capacities but willingness, daringness, neediness.  They are the work of a writer much younger, much more self-assured in spite of how much he insists he is not.  He may have a hidden or not-so-hidden streak of self-hatred, but he masks it and transmutes it into something acceptably public even while it feels at times like we are reading an old-style “true confessions” book---yet it is confessional in ways not usually found in American writing. Is it an almost embarassing itimacy.  The narrator is not talking to his therapist or confidante but to himself in ways he would never want anyone else to know or hear.   Have any reviewers talked about that?  They don’t seem to have that many reviews, actually.  Maybe the success of the movie will prompt some longer, more considered assessments.  London Review?  I will search now.  Or TLS?

Last episode of The Crown.  Wrecked lives.  Almost tragic? 

Driving all day, icy roads, ice on trees, gray.  Food.  A few pages of Proust every so often.  No visit to the acupuncturist, disappointment there.  Still raining outside, dripping.  Late.  Time for bed. 

The word “rat” in Aciman’s vocabulary.  In Enigma he uses it in the same way as in the interview.  Must be a word, an American idiom, he loved learning when he was a newcomer and trying hard to master the slang of his new New York school friends.  Or did he get caught or accused of ratting out his friends, or did someone rat out him?  “I wonder if in the universe of sleep, dreams don’t fly out and rat on one another’s dreamers and hold cloak-and-dagger meetings in the side alleys of our nights where they slip coded messages, which is perhaps exactly what we want them to do for us when we lack the courage to speak for ourselves.”  162  Enigma

152  When I thought about it, it made me feel I’d infringed on something wholesome and private and ever so chaste about you, like an instance of the holy that suddenly flares before our eyes and then leaves us speechless, humbled, and shaken.” 

This could describe the effect of A’s work.  Why it embarrasses us, shakes us up, an instance of the holy that flares suddenly before our eyes. 



24 January

TV ad for law firm uses melanoma and cialis as the hook for giving the law firm a call.  May or may not be an ethical tv ad but it got me looking around again at cialis and eczema and I am now convinced the key factor is Cialis.  Just realized too I could ask my nephew the urologist to see what he might or might not say here.  But clearly it was less than two years ago, year or so? when Fagan and the Mid-Point pharmacy shifted the Viagra prescription to Cialis and I have been taking that exclusively for maybe a little over a year.  Not that often but still.  Going to stop altogether for few months and see what happens.  I think the worst recent flare-up of the eczema was Monday evening, tonight is Wednesday, and I last took the pill on Sunday evening (maybe Saturday?).  Anyway, it takes three days to kick-in successfully it has always seemed and it has always seemed that it kicks-in and then stays in for too long---after effects seem to last two or three days after the initial punch.  And it has always felt less effective and less comfortable than Viagra.  That had its unpleasant effects but they were different.  That’s my theory for today.  Dartmouth Hitchcock actually called today to see if I wanted an appointment with my doctor there.  I sent an email to Cris to see if I could ask him
his opinion. 

25 Jan

Off to take the car for maintenance.  Repair guy for the dishwasher between 1 and 4.  Va staying home for that.  Now of course it seems silly to target Cialis.  Did ask Cris on email.  Could easily be the beer and wine.  Yeast, fungus.  Some people online say put apple cider vinegar on the nummules themselves.  Try it.  Had that cider vinegar mango drink yesterday, try more of that.  Probiotics!  Flares were all remarkably quiet last night, direct causal result of that vinegary drink no doubt.  Get a case of it and see if that is the key.  How we, not we but the logical brain, needs, needs, needs a single bullet cause and explanation.  Did not go to yoga last night.  George and Darlene sick and I would feel too conspicuous in that group without George being there.  Wanted to find a group with a few more elderly guys like me but guess not.  Maybe I’ll drop it altogether after one or two more stints. 

158 in Engima Paolo/Paul/Pauly talks about his fantasies taking over and indeed this is what the books invite, some kind of inner wild fantasy confessional intimacy.  Think of how Fitzgerald distanced all of it by having his narrator be on the frame of the supposed story in center focus.  Aciman brushes aside all of that.  His harkening back to the Princess de Cleve as a favorite source (and subject of his intense academic work) gives a fine antique burnish to his ways of telling and ways of knowingly asking, “Freud, what Freud, who was he and why should we care?”  And the place of the father in the works?  Father-son love, man to man love, man to woman love, love to love love, longing in all of its guises.  Fatherness hovering behind it all, over it all.  A Jewish sensibility?  Egyptian/Middle Eastern?
Mediterranean?  That case could certainly be made most strongly. 

And at the key moment of revelation to Manfred, Pauly shows him his photo of himself as a twelve-year old.  Adolescent hero worship-love-crush, directly invoked as a good reason for adults to keep going with the crush.  Who would do that?  What would John Cheever have had to say about that?  Or even Updike?  We know how much Bellow would have scoffed at it.  Generationalism at its worst and best here?  Is Aciman proud to be a not-grown-up eternal adolescent?  Is Pauly?  Has he never heard of the Peter Pan boy put-down by American thinkers, feminists?   Aciman can reply to any and all such question with his universal answer---“humans are a mess.” 

Twitter brings news of Aciman’s piece on the movie in Vanity Fair.  Audible channel interview with Faith Salie about Enigma Variations.  Vignettes, aperçus. 

“We are always enigmatic to ourselves.”   “What do I want?”  I don’t know.  Always in a condition of uncertainty when you want something. 

“The book is about wanting.”   Abington Square was written first. 
“We should never be bitter about what people have done, what we have done.”

every molecule of feeling, the fermentation of desire,

writing makes you vulnerable and bold, everyone has thought and felt everything in this book---courage to write frank assessment of our sexuality is what I want to do---he’s in the closet, he’s polyamorous---we all are--what we do is another question.  Love stories are mysteries.  Always a revelation at the end (not O’Henry!!).  The other person makes us love ourselves---if they make us a person we don’t want to be, we don’t love them. 

Salie gives Aciman fifteen minutes almost and then switches to the British guy who gives out the bad literary sex award each year for the Literary Review.  Ho hum. 

So Aciman says pretty much what we know he will say.  By now.  I’ve got his number!  Ha.  But not his courage to write as he does.  Nor, I guess, do I want to have it now that we think more about it.  Venture to say his Eight is about his relationship with his wife, more or less.  And for that reason is it much less about the sex that followed (is there any in it??), and all about the courtship tennis game stretched out many readers would say for far too many pages.  He loves the book because he loved the courtship and loved recreating it and slowing it down and enjoying as a writer how much it gave him to write about, to savor and to explore. That’s what he most enjoys doing. 

I should fire off one final question to him---Envy.  You write about envy more fully and more delicately and more insightfully than any writer I’ve ever read.  Bravo
for that, thank you for that.  Why is that?  Why have so few writers written about envy or have written so poorly about envy?  Until you? 

That’s good.  I’ll fire that off and then we done with him.  Back to Proust.  Today in Fugitive Proust dazzled as he is supposed to do. 

But didn’t I do a word search and find that the word envy does not show up that many times in Eight?  Better re-check that.  But even so, the query is worth it. 
He brings up envy at all the most perfect moments in these relationships. 

26 January

Phone chat with Rick E about funds.  I like the way he talks about things, both his voice and his takes on things.  His wife is an architect, from Guatemala, and they are building their first small house on Lake Sunapee.  He bought some kind of saw today to rework something on the insulation that the builder had not done properly.  They are using a German plan for super-insulation and lowest possible heating expenses.  The thick walls will be filled with cellulose---newspaper or something similar.  I told him we were going to White River Jct tomorrow for lunch and he mentioned the British place.  I knew he meant Piecemeal Pie and told him it was not British, that is that the chef-owner hails from West Virginia.  I forget how I found that out two years ago.  Someone at the Tucker Box most likely. 

Marci called again tonight, upset.  Rick’s doctor in Abq says he has cancer, told him this a year ago, apparently.  They will stay in Abq and Marci’s daughter will pack up Rick’s things and send them up.  No clear prognosis or treatment info. 

We swam and then walked at Lowes and then lunched at BurritoMe.  Water was cold and have I felt chilled all day or just imagining that? 

Somewhere looking around the interviews I found Aciman telling us that he uses a Waterman Charleston rollerball pen.  !  Should I buy one?  $150. more or less.  Wait.  Good passage from one site about why he likes novellas---psychological focus and tension---describes perfectly the pieces in Enigma:

“I’ve always loved novellas, namely because they exhibit a degree of concentrated psychological acuity, which novels, because they need to provide so much material devoted to plot, simply end up diluting. A novella is focused on one issue—doggedly. Space is a premium, but not time. A novella can span years, months, or days—provided there is a revelation at the end, and provided the story—or is it an elegy—is about a tremulous, forbidden desire. Best of all, and unlike a short story, a novella does not need that idiotic move called a twist at the end. Revelation is one thing; twist quite another.”

Perfect.  But it does not apply to Proust very well.  It could be used pretty well, however, for Modiano.  His works are all short, novella length or just a little bit more.  Not sure if the term works even in French.  But still, and given the sense Aciman has in mind, of intensity and revelation, we can say that Modiano gets his power by using the short form but without the dogged acuity and without the revelation.  A powerful sense of displacement and lostness and nothing or very little adding up to anything.  A difference profound between the two writers, primarily of generation but also of geography and ultimately family.  Modiano had no family, at least not compared to Aciman, who had a supremely intense family experience. 

Today is now Saturday 27 January.  Poor Willow slept poorly last night, worried about Rick’s cancer.  Petie asked for the name of his doctor and we’re all hoping for more information and clarity of what’s next, if the doctor can say much.  Watching “Nurse Jackie” now in the evenings may not be helping. 

Helps to have temperatures go back to the 40s today for our big luncheon in White River. 

night  Fun and strange gathering.  Helen coming down off of a migraine.  Had been a week at the farm with her brother and older sister.  Anna is moving to Kuai to take a prosecutor’s job.  We were all sort of spacey, conversation disjointed into two ends of the table.  Food was good.  Day never that warm and sunny but ok. 

------
to Phil

Yes have heard of a Salt Room Spa.  I think Va's brother tried it once in Mexico.
Ask them if it is supposed to help with adult/senior eczema.  (Of course I know
what they will say, but still . . . .)  I'm going to try some accupressure/puncture
on Tuesday to see if that does anything.  Also going to look for a different
dermatologist to get another opinion.  I now later up on moisturizers all over 

about once or twice a day.  we went swimming this morning and the pool water
really dries out my hide.  one's one-track mind and mind devoured by fifty years of advertising just refuses to believe there isn't a pill one can take for this crap
and/or a causal indicator one can avoid.  Stop drinking merlot and your skin will clearn up within two months.  That sort of magical thinking.

Va's brother came home from Mexico, to Abq.  His doctor here says he has a cancerous tumor behind one eye.  Waiting to hear further prognostications on that.
Meanwhile her sister and new husband have been in England, suburban London for
three weeks.  He's overseeing a remodeling of a conference center for their church. 

They both find the cold and rain are not doing their asthma and overall health much good.  


Photos on the news of Paris flooded but Dave says their district is ok


Hope the Salt room does help Peg.

-----------

Found a salt cave spa right here in Salem.  I’m going on Tuesday, after the acupressure session! 

Monday  29 January 

super special moon coming up this week. 

Listening to another version of La Prisonniere read by Andre Dussollier
and like his voice a lot.  Took and epsom salts bath, soak.  Did it do any good?   Read a short ebook about healing from eczema.  Young woman. 

Tuesday  30 Jan

Super moons next two nights.  Gray and cloudy this morning.  Off to Lawrence and acupressure treatment and then if time the salt room. 
Wholistic new age, post-new age, retro-new age searches.  Mineral salts bath might actually have helped last night.  The flare nodules look much quieter today. 

Night  Splendid day of first-time adventures.  Had I ever seen Lawrence?  Huge mill buildings.  Acupressure guy in there, urban lofts marketed I suppose to Boston commuters.  North Shore includes Lawrence according to him.  Great massage and overall experience.  After that I found the Salt Cave in Salem, paid $20. and was the only customer in the basement chamber.  Meditation music and float-back sling chairs so I had a fine nap within the forty-five minute zone.  Woke up about ten minutes before the end. Some sort of salted air is blown into the chamber as well as what radiates off from the two tons of Himalayan pink salt.  When did the pink salt craze begin here?  Ten years ago?  And why?  As with the acu-ssage,
doing this just to see what it was like was delightful.  Maybe like a sauna
without the heat?  Can see how it would feel good for respiration problems. 
Tim today confirmed and answered and embellished on so many notions and ideas I’ve had over the years.  In one session.  Will go back.  Salt room also. 

31 Jan  Weds night

Fine French movie last night, “Going Away,”  “Un beau dimanche” 2013. 

Saturday, January 13, 2018

I could easily go back through all of Aciman’s published work and underline passages and write in the margins of the pages, same for me, this is me, this was me, he states perfectly what I’ve always felt about these things, he writes about this as I would have written about such things, such perfect synch between what he says or describes and what I’ve long experienced and felt.  But is this not what we do with so many writers?  We find ways to believe they write for us, express what we want to have expressed.  We identify, after all, with the tales they tell, the characters they describe, the ways they express thought, storylines, the narrative voices they use.  This is the whole of literary art and how readers have always enjoyed it.  But, no, with Aciman there is a distinct difference for me.  He describes feeling, longing, anxiety, ambivalence, being in the middle of situations, places, people, moods, thoughts, in all the ways familiar to my own inner life.  Much more so than any other writer I’ve ever read.  I have been waiting for over fifty years to find a writer like Aciman.  I had given up hope of every finding one like him.  The closest most recently has been Pessoa.  When I read The Book of Disquiet only a few years ago, I said oh if only I had had this book forty years or so ago.  Why had I never read this book before now?  Pessoa as companion and guide would have helped me so much at so many moments in life.  With Aciman, this same sort of recognition and relief but even closer to the bone.  Uncanny it felt.  Instant sense of deep inner accord.  No matter how much he talks about the externals of his story, and they are as dramatic and noteworthy for a major writer as possible---Alexandria, Jewish, Ladino, France, Rome, New York, memoir, novels, essays, awards, fellowships, the whole success of the writer in our time--no matter all of this.  The essential wonder is how much, how perfectly, my own experiences in their felt rhythems and patterns align with all that he feels about his outer life.

Saturday, April 08, 2017

Annotating

I could easily go back through all of Aciman’s published work and underline passages and write in the margins of the pages, same for me, this is me, this was me, he states perfectly what I’ve always felt about these things, he writes about this as I would have written about such things, such perfect synch between what he says or describes and what I’ve long experienced and felt.  But is this not what we do with so many writers?  We find ways to believe they write for us, express what we want to have expressed.  We identify, after all, with the tales they tell, the characters they describe, the ways they express thought, storylines, the narrative voices they use.  This is the whole of literary art and how readers have always enjoyed it.  But, no, with Aciman there is a distinct difference for me.  He describes feeling, longing, anxiety, ambivalence, being in the middle of situations, places, people, moods, thoughts, in all the ways familiar to my own inner life.  Much more so than any other writer I’ve ever read.  I have been waiting for over fifty years to find a writer like Aciman.  I had given up hope of every finding one like him.  The closest most recently has been Pessoa.  When I read The Book of Disquiet only a few years ago, I said oh if only I had had this book forty years or so ago.  Why had I never read this book before now?

Pessoa as companion and guide would have helped me so much at so many moments in life.  With Aciman, this same sort of recognition and relief but even closer to the bone.  Uncanny it felt.  Instant sense of deep inner accord.  No matter how much he talks about the externals of his story, and they are as dramatic and noteworthy for a major writer as possible---Alexandria, Jewish, Ladino, France, Rome, New York, memoir, novels, essays, awards, fellowships, the whole success of the writer in our time--no matter all of this.  The essential wonder is how much, how perfectly, my
own experiences in their felt rhythems and patterns align with all that he feels about his outer life. 

Long passage below from his essay called “Intimacy.”  to which I say Yes, Yes, Yes and Yes, that’s how it was for me too.  Me too Alypius, Augustine’s friend in The Confessions.  I have always often times been that person, but this is different.  Aciman is just uncanny in saying my notions about all of these things. 

“It never occurred to me then that insight and intuition, which are the essence, the genius of all criticism, are born from this intimate fusion of self with something or someone else. To everything—books, places, people—I brought a desire to steal into and intuit something undisclosed, perhaps because I mistrusted all appearances, or because I was so withdrawn that I needed to believe others were as dissembled and withdrawn as I feared I was. Perhaps I loved prying. Perhaps insight was like touching—but without asking, without risk. Perhaps spying was my way of reaching out to the Roman life that was all around me. In the words of Emanuele Tesauro: “We enjoy seeing our own thoughts blossom in someone’s mind, while that someone is equally pleased to spy what our own mind furtively conceals.” I was a cipher. But, like me, everyone was a cipher as well. Ultimately, I wanted to peer into books, places, and people because wherever I looked I was always looking for myself, or for traces of myself, or better yet, for a world out there filled with people and characters who could be made to be like me, because being like me and being me and liking the things I liked was nothing more than their roundabout way of being as close to, as open to, and as bound to me as I wished to be to them. The world in my image. All I cared for were streets that bore my name and the trace of my passage there; and all I cared for were novels in which everyone’s soul was laid bare and anatomized, because nothing interested me more than the nether, undisclosed aspects of people and things that were identical to mine. Exposed, everyone would turn out to be just like me. They understood me, I understood them, we were no longer strangers. I dissembled, they dissembled. The more they were like me, the more I’d learn to accept and perhaps grow to like who I was. My hunches, my insights were nothing more than furtive ways of bridging the insuperable distance between me and the world.

"In the end, my solitude, my disaffection, my shame on Via Clelia, and my wish to withdraw into an imaginary 19th-century bubble were not incidental to the books I was reading. My disaffection was part of what I saw in these books and was essential to my reading of them, just as what I read in Ovid was not unrelated to my tremulous yearnings for the swarthy knees of the gypsy girl. But they were essential in an altogether strange and undisclosed manner. I wasn’t identifying with Dostoyevsky’s characters because I too was poor or withdrawn, anymore than I was identifying with the lust of Byblis and Salmacis because I would have given anything to undress the gypsy girl in my bedroom. What my favorite authors were asking of me was that I read them intimately—not an invitation to read my own pulse on someone else’s work, but to read an author’s pulse as though it were my own, the height of presumption, because it presupposed that by trusting my deepest, most intimate thoughts about a book, I was in fact tapping on, or rather divining, the author’s own.”

Aciman's Irrealis--notes

great passage from Spurious by Josipivici---makes me like him much more, have to give him a read, and continue on with Proust

[Reading In Search of Lost Time] gave me the powerful sense that it didn't matter if one could not see one's way forward, it didn't matter if one was silly and slow and confused, it didn't matter if one had got hold of the wrong end of the stick - what mattered was to keep going. I began to see that the doubts I had were in a sense the temptations of the Devil, the attempt to make me give up at the very start by presenting things in absolute terms (I can do it/ no, I can't do it); and that what Proust (like Dante before him, I later discovered) was offering was a way of fighting that by saying: All right, I am confused, then let me start with my confusion, let me incorporate my confusion into the book or story I am writing, and see if that helps. If I can't start, then let me write about not being able to start. Perhaps, after all, confusion and failure are not things one has to overcome before one can start, but deep human experiences which deserve themselves to be explored in art. Perhaps, indeed, the stick has no right end and therefore no wrong end.
Gabriel Josipovici, The Teller and the Tale

Letter from Dave today to Dear Angel Investor requesting funds to carry family of four across the atlantic this summer. 

Aciman in form again too---on the wishfilms we throw over everything, every place, in our craving for romance.  Longing for intimacy and love, the remanence of our presence.  154-155 in Alibis, the essay on luminous New York.  The next essay, on “Self Storage,” also right on the money.  Those few moments, seconds, hours, when he/I find some solitude and recoup, recharge, find who I am again, for a while, find some core, imagined or real or illusory, some longed-for center, and from there “for a few imagined seconds . . . was finally able to run away from those I couldn’t be more grateful to love.” 

Why am I feeling so fragile today?  What has spooked me?  Upset?  10 days of Caribbean sun and warmth destabilized?  Re-entry? new carpet, day at pheasant lane in mid-week?  Trying to hear French?  Turn of seasons into spring, out of the burrows of winter?  April is the cruelest month, breeding lilacs out of the dead earth.  Flooding the basements built on granite ledge. Now we wait two or three days, turn our faces to the wall and ignore the waters.  Wait for the earth to dry and open and carry away the excess efluvia. 

For a little over fifteen years I tried to get away from books.  I took up painting to use up lots of time I otherwise would have spent reading books.  I had read enough.  Too many.  They had piled up.  Shelves crammed.  Too many trips to used bookstores to sell some, even more trips to other bookstores to buy more.  I rented a studio space in a small office building on Main Street.  Lawyers at one end of the hall.  A masseur in the corner at the other end.  A mail-order business in worms for pets in one office and about the two others I was never quite sure.  Maybe the woman I would see off and on, rarely, entering and leaving the unmarked door to the left of my space was a therapist.  Maybe not.  And in the office to my right, I never saw anyone leave or enter.  Was it even an office?  From outside, the windows added up properly and said, yes, that room must have been a duplicate of the one I used three or four afternoons a week.  I would teach my classes in the mornings, as I had been doing for more than twenty-five years.  After scrupulously being available for students to seek help in my office I would walk down the hill to my painting studio as I began to call it and I would paint.  Or sit.  I allowed myself one chair on which to look back a the works I was painting.  No books.  It was hard at first not to carry a book with me, but pretty soon I got the hang of it.  I didn’t think of it at the time as a flight from books.  In fact it was probably not really that at all.  That is just a way of looking back at it now.  It was more like a way of filling out the act of reading by expanding it to the whole of seeing.  The page became the canvas, words merged into paint, consciousness wanted to embrace thought and image, all attempts to express and contain, pour forth and hold onto, colors, forms, lines, shaped letters, words, in voice, cadence in movement held in paint and ink. 

Aciman “You don’t know whether what you feel is what you you feel or what you say you feel, just as you don’t know whether saying you feel something is actually a way of saying anything at all aboout it.”  Alibis 199  You wing it.  You hope others believe you.  If they believe you, then you might as well copy them and believe the person they believe.”

Perfect license for practicing Pierre Menardism. 

“I’ve built my home not even with words and what they mean but with cadence, just cadence, because cadence is like feeling, and cadence is like breathing, and cadence is heartbeat and desire, and if cadence doesn’t reinvent everything we would like our life to have been or to become, then just the act of searching and probing in that particularly cadenced way becomes a way of feeling and of being in the world.”

Aciman uses irrealis at the end of the final essay on Parallax--page 189
“Parallax is not just a disturbance in vision. It’s a derealizing and paralyzing disturbance in the soul—cognitive, metaphysical, intellectual, and ultimately aesthetic. It is not just about displacement, or of feeling adrift both in time and space, it is a fundamental misalignment between who we are, might have been, could still be, can’t accept we’ve become, or may never be. You assume you are not quite like others and that to understand others, to be with others, to love others, and to be loved by them, you need to think other thoughts than the ones that come naturally. To be with others you must be the opposite of who you are; to read others, you must read the opposite of what you see; to be somewhere, you must suspect you are or could be elsewhere. This is the irrealis-mood. You feel, you imagine, you think, and ultimately write counterfactually, because writing speaks this disturbance, investigates it, because writing also perpetuates and consolidates it and hopes to make sense of it by giving it a form.”

Most recently in the essay on Sebald in American Scholar this past December.  Part of the forthcoming collection of essays on the idea, which will be entitled Homo Irrealis. 

Monday, February 20, 2017

Aciman Replies

Feb 12
Dear Robert Garlitz,

I am in Berlin for a few days because they are screening Call Me by Your Name.  It showed at Sundance, but I was too...lazy to go to Utah. Berlin I love.  But I am taking some time out because I wanted to write back.

Yes for the house in either Nantucket or the Vineyard.  But before I sign anything, let me just say this.  I have been in print  for 20 years now and received some adulation, but never--i.e. NEVER--have I felt that a reader understood me to the bone or so thoroughly as you did in your blog. You went straight to the soul of things--to use mystical language--because you got what I have elsewhere called the "soufflé" effect, the folding back and forth without necessarily arriving at any answer, a form of treading water, of floating but not swimming.  I can go on but it is the subject of what I hope will be a forthcoming collection of essays on various artists entitled Homo Irrealis, based on the irrealis mood, something that linguists call the indefinite mood in grammar.  Wikipedia has, I think, a damn good
definition.

In any event, you have inspired me to get Pessoa and see what he writes.  Thank you so much for ... well, thinking of me, thinking
about me.
André

tweets

“I miss the future when I’ll be able to look back and miss all of this, however absurdly.”  Pessoa Disquiet 180

"The orator,dizzy from speaking the unspeakable. The monster, drunk on the thought of the monstrosities he heralds Binet on The Blond Beast in his novel about Heydrich.



Friday, February 10, 2017

Mid-February weather report

Ready to Survive Mud Season

On the desk, bookmarks in each, at least ten pages in. 

HHhH
Sudden Death
Missing Person
False Papers
Mystical Languages of Unsaying
Alibis
Tantra Illuminated
The Varieties of Religious Experience
Eight White Nights
The Man of Light in Iranian Suifism
The Proust Project
Villa Triste
The Voyager and the Messenger
The Garden of Truth
The Black Notebook
Damaged Lives

Tuesday, February 07, 2017

André Aciman and Apophatic Theology

Aciman, Our Apophatic Mystic

Over the past few weeks I’ve been catching up on the work of André Aciman.  The great memoir and three of the novels.  Started a fourth, Eight White Nights, earlier this week. 

Felt like I should take a break, though, and cast about for what to read.  Could go back to Patrick Modiano, but even though I like his work as much, the most recent book I had stopped after one-third, Missing Person, has themes a bit too similar to those of Aciman.  A blurb from the back cover says the book “portrays a man in pursuit of the identity he lost in the murky days of the Paris Occupation, the black hole of French memory.”  Not too unlike Aciman’s searches for himself after his exile from Alexandria.

I googled Aciman some more, hoping to find he had written an essay on Pessoa.  Nothing promising but did read a few interviews that are online. 

After sleeping on it for a day or so and trying not to ponder too hard, I thought I would take a look at something on apophatic theology.  Real change of pace.  I found the new copy of Michael Sells book, Mystical Languages of Unsaying.  I had read some of the authors under discussion.  I had not realized that “The 150-year period from the mid-twelfth to the beginning of the fourteenth century constitutes the flowering of apophatic mysticism.  Almost simultaneously, the apophatic masterpieces of the Islamic, Jewish, and Christian traditions appeared . . . .” Such a short, intense cross cultural or intercultural period.  It made me wonder about apophatic forms of expression in our time.  I googled “apophatic novel” and up came, of course, the books by Charles Williams.  The Greater Trumps, Shadows of Ecstasy, War in Heaven, The Descent of the Dove.  I had read those years ago but had forgotten them.  I have long privately thought of Beckett’s works as explorations in negative theology.  I suppose there are many dissertations on the topic by now.  I would read Pessoa’s The Book of Disquiet this way. 

Day or so later I picked up a book of Aciman’s prose pieces.  A different voice in these than in the novels and it is the voice in the fictions that I love best.  But in the first few essays in False Papers I began to see how clearly Aciman is an apophatic writer.  “Exile” and “Memory” are in the subtitle and these words Aciman repeats endlessly in marvelously woven intricacies.  But it is desire, longing, that everything he talks about serves.  And look at these passages: 

“It was my way of preempting tomorrow’s worries by making tomorrow seem yesterday, of warding off adversity by warding off happiness as well.  In the end, I learned not to enjoy going to Paris, or even to enjoy being there--because I enjoyed it too much.”

“The Paris I cultivated was a Paris one need not stay too long in.  It was a Paris made to be yearned for and remembered, a Paris of the mind, a Paris which stood for the true life, the life done over, the better life, the one flooded in limelight, with tinsel, soundtrack, and costume.”

“I had long ago learned to prefer the imagined encounter, or the memory of the imagined encounter, to the thing itself.”

This is the basic pattern of all of Aciman’s writing---a saying and then an unsaying.  In Sell’s words “apophsis cannot help but posit . . . a ‘thing’ or ‘being,’ a being it must then unsay, while positing yet more entities that must be unsaid in turn.”  Aciman’s characters love and then lose and learn to unlove, whether a place like Alexandria or Paris, or a person, like Oliver who his love, Elio, asks to call him by his name.  Eight White Nights would be a great title for a mystical work, like The Cloud of Unknowing.  “what I was feeling was not just admiration . . . .  The word worship---as in ‘I could worship people like her’--hadn’t crossed my mind yet, though later that evening which I stood with her watching a glowing moonlight barge moored across the white Hudson I did turn to worship.  Because placid winterscapes lift up the soul and bring down our guard.  Because part of me was already venturing into an amorphous terrain in which a word here, a word there--any word, really---is all we have to hold on to before surrendering to a will far mightier than our own.”  (my emphasis)

I suppose there are already many dissertations in a university libraries on the apophatic tradition in Modernist and Post-Modernist literature.   Aciman is certainly our principal practitioner at this moment.  Yearning oscillates between the poles of every bridge, every love, every utterance, every saying and unsaying.  Memory, exile, love and loss sustain this longing, as with every mystic. 

Tuesday, January 31, 2017

Modiano, Knausgaard, Aciman and Marías

Aciman, Knausgaard, Modiano---at the turn of the 20th Century these writers mark the turn of the novel as a work of fiction into a blended work of remembered consciousness, autobiography seguing into fiction and fiction back into remembered past.  Much as the author of Historical Consciousness, John Lukacs, described and predicted.  Proust perhaps first at the start of the century.  What about Javier Marías?  His novels do not have quite the same attitude or voice as these other three writers.  If he draws on his own life stories, he plays these cards much closer to his chest than the three others.  Marias needs to use a fictive design as an armature.  See his most recent work, Thus Bad Begins.  Hamlet figures all through the work even though Marías describes clearly Madrid in the ‘80s as he remembers it and other features of the experience of living through the long, slow end of the Franco era.  A major tale of abusive behavior also provides a main element of the novel, a doctor who raped patients and wives of patients and who succeeded in keeping this behavior safe behind a public image of charity and honor.  And yet for all of that, the novel does not have that personal feel of intimate, remembered consciousness that the works of Knausgaard, Modiano and Aciman have.  They must tell their stories---there is a sense of their personal need to find who they were and are by exploring what happened to them, what all they happened to do over the years they look back upon.  Marías in contrast is a consummate borrower and cobbler of bits and pieces of stories he has heard, he knows or believes to be true in one way or another.  He loves to weave them into intricate tapestries of layered consciousness, imitated consciousness, for his pleasure and the pleasure of the reader. A silversmith in Toledo, inlaying threads of gold and silver into the metal of the sword.  Damascene work.  But for Modiano and Aciman and Knausgaard the appeal of damascene intricacy is hardly present at all.  They may scramble timeline and thematic links but they cannot help it, this is the way the moments came back to them, the ways they grabbed them as much as they could, from possible escape.  A slight tinge of the desperation of getting into the right words the imagined and remembered way things need to be caught if they are to be caught at all. 

Sunday, January 29, 2017

Aciman on Voice

Voice
“Voice is not just telling a story, it is the attitude in the story that has to exist in every single sentence, because it is the attitude that keeps the reader going.”   2012 interview on daysofyore

Monday, January 23, 2017

André Aciman

Main event otherwise is Aciman has arrived.  Reading his book Enigma Variations.  Had I vaguely heard of his Harvard Square or some other title?  How did I decide to look into his book?  He’s been famous for about ten years.  Has the 5ooo limit friends on facebook.  etc.  but I’m glad I am reading this book and will read all the others.  I think.  Love his writing and the way he focuses on interior flow of consciousness, thought and feeling. 

email from the kindle iphone to myself---

Hi - I'm reading "Enigma Variations: A Novel" by André Aciman and wanted to share this quote with you.

"You and I don’t love the way others do—we run on empty.” She touched my face, my forehead. “I could tell you to be happy that you have him, but it won’t help. I could tell you to be happy we’ve got two days, but that won’t help either. You’re alone, as I’m alone, and the cruelest thing is that finding each other and saying let us be alone together won’t solve a thing.””  no page number though  Loc 3201  so weird

8:40pm  Finished Enigma Variations.  Final section, Abingdon Square, felt like a let-down.  Felt forced and unnecessary. 

quotes  “I’d grown to love serving two masters.”  “and the unspoken tinge of indecency in every avowal--that thrilled and stirred me . . . .”  “I was like an ellipse, with two competing foci but no center.”  "We were neither friends, nor strangers, nor lovers, just wavering, as I wavered, as I wished to think she wavered, each grateful for the other’s silence as we watched the evening drift into night on this tiny park that was neither on Hudson, nor on Bleecker, nor on Eighth Avenue, but a tangent to all three, as we ourselves were, perhaps, nothing more than tangents in each other’s life. In a blizzard, we’d be the first to go, we’d have nowhere to go. Ours, I began to fear, was a script without parts.”

-------
still I will keep reading in the other books.  do feel some duty to finish the others I’d started last fall. 

Thurs morning 20th  Aciman has me again after all.  Call Me By Your Name.  The narrator talks of envy and similitude and the hunger for acceptance, recognition.  The eternal teenager in us, Aciman seems to have a talent for recapturing that over and over.  Tempted to troll through Goodreads to see what others say about the books.  Later perhaps.  Enough still to have found them.  Being Jewish is a topic and for me it satisfies enough for curiosity and I can easily replace it for being Catholic, strangely enough. 


Aciman’s writing reminds me of reading Brideshead Revisited, listening to Leonard Cohen, or, even, reading Pessoa?  No, Pessoa feels different even if akin. 



Hadn’t realized until looking at Goodreads that Enigma Variations is listed as being published this year, 2017.  Call Me  ten years earlier, 2007. 

“They had always said I got too easily attached to people.” 60
“Here was someone who lacked for nothing.  I couldn’t understand this feeling.  I envied him.” 26

“How could anyone intuit the manner of someone’s thinking unless he himself was already familiar with this same mode of thinking?”  22

Being and having “in  the twisted skein of desire” are one and the same thing. 68

A minute of grace.  Between always and never.  Celan.  70

Finishing Aciman more slowly to make it last.  Plans to declare him on twitter the greatest INFP writer ever, Enneagram 4, and bisexuality realist. 

Monday  23 Jan 

Aciman’s novel incredibly beautiful.  And perfect.  Having the father give his knowing blessing to the relationship part of that rather amazing perfection.  Having it be situated perfectly on the Mediterranean also.  Is it in fact too perfect?  Could that be so?  No, it is a wonder.  Like a Keats ode.  Now it is a movie at Sundance, review posted just 8 hours ago.  ! 

Peter Debruge’s review for Variety is exceptionally well done and has this paragraph about the father: “No matter how intellectually progressive the Perlman family is, no father has ever said something so open-minded and eloquent to his son, and yet, the film offers this conversation as a gift to audiences who might have desperately needed to hear it in their own lives. Such liberties are permissible given the story’s 1983 setting, which suggests that this isn’t a literal rendering of Elio’s experience, but a bittersweet embellishment of his memory. These were the days that shaped him, marked by the intense tastes, textures, and odors which Guadagnino so effectively amplifies for our benefit.”

Sounds like the movie is successful. 

The reviewer of the book for the Times, D’Erasmo, quotes this passage from Aciman on nostalgia:  “In his essay “Pensione Eolo,” Aciman writes, “Ultimately, the real site of nostalgia is not the place that was lost or the place that was never quite had in the first place; it is the text that must record that loss.” In other words, Elio and Oliver might give each other up, but the book that conjures them doesn’t give up either one. In fact, it brings them back together, reunites them, for a glorious endless summer. In the book, the river can be revisited. The closing words echo the title: a phrase simultaneously of elegy and of invitation.”

I like the line from the Post---In The Washington Post, Charles Kaiser said, "If you have ever been the willing victim of obsessive love--a force greater than yourself that pulls you inextricably toward the object of your desire--you will recognize every nuance of André Aciman's superb new novel, 'Call Me by Your Name.’”  Obsessive is a better frame than “gay” and the wikipedia article where I found this uses “bisexual” somewhere in it.  At least it shows up on search under that term but of course the main press hails the movie and book as a gay story.  Aciman makes clear that it is not so easily boxed. 

Message from student gave me line from Beckett---“It is suicide to be abroad”, grumbles Mrs Rooney in Samuel Beckett’s All That Fall, “but what is it to be at home . . . what is it to be at home? A lingering dissolution.”

passages from “Call Me” to bring up the subtexts I focused on.

Marzia says this so am in doubt as to whether to post it:  “People who read are hiders.  They hide who they are.  People who hide don’t always like who they are.” 115  

Could be just an inside joke between writer and reader.  One of the oldest complaints about reading. 

“I envied him.”  the author of If Love.  113

I like how often envy is mentioned.  More than any other book in recent memory. 

“the inflections of desire . . . could only be conveyed in play.” 186

“I want you as intermezzo . . . as both, or as in between.”  196

Here is Aciman’s genius, and few reviewers see it clearly enough.  The obsessiveness of the experience serves this desire for the transit into the middle of the bridge.  The hovering in the middle, that is the experience beyond every other. 

“I had never envied him the past, nor felt threatened by it.  . . . I didn’t envy life before me, nor did I ache to travel back to the time when he had been my age.”   201

“Rehearse the pain to dull the pain.  Homeopathically.” 210

Because he was himself, he was myself.  Montaigne  “he’s more myself than I am.”  Bronte  223

“No reader of Montaigne can forget that stunning moment when, after probing why he loved his deceased friend Etienne de La Boétie so much, the author of the essays, this master-stylist of baroque prose, breaks down and scrawls out one of the most beautiful sentences penned in French: “You ask me why I loved him,” Montaigne says. “I don’t know. All I can say is parce que c’était lui, parce que c’était moi.” Because it was he, because it was I. Proust too knows how to “  PEN America 2007

Father says to Elio “You had a beautiful friendship.  Maybe more than a friendship.  And I envy you.” . . . . “But to feel nothing so as not to feel anything--what a waste!”  224

“‘The truth is I’m not sure I can feel nothing.  And if I am to meet your family, I would prefer not to feel anything.”  235

“God, the way they envied us from across the dinner table that first night in Rome,” 239

“And we’ll want to call it envy, because to call it regret would break our hearts.”  239

“it would finally dawn on us both that he was more me that I had ever been myself, because when he became me and I became him in bed so many years ago, he was and would forever remain, long after every forked road in life had done its work, my brother, my friend, my father, my son, my husband, my lover, myself.” 243

Jeff P Jones on The Millions gets everything right about Enigma Variations.  Especially the dominance of feeling.

“But this section also reveals something at the heart of Paul’s character: he’s happiest in the throes of yearning after new love because he knows that acquisition never leads to contentment. Obsessing over his feelings for Manfred, Paul thinks, “The circuit is always the same: from attraction to tenderness to obsessive longing, and then to surrender, desuetude, apathy, fatigue, and finally scorn.” Familiarity is the come-down; Paul’s drug is feeling itself, the more intense the better.”

Except feeling is not the “drug.”  It is the way of being, the primary process of living itself. 

Jones adds “Love, infatuation, desire — these most powerful of feelings, this novel says — reduce and enlarge us in ways that are wonderfully juvenescent, at once simplifying and magnifying the world.”

Jones also gets exactly the “P” nature of the way Aciman describes desire.  “P” as in INFP.  “Paul’s focus isn’t on the repercussions from leaving an old lover as much as it is on savoring the possibilities of new love.

“Intriguingly, as we witness Paul repeatedly rearrange his life around a new magnetic north, it becomes clear that his bisexuality abets his serial monogamy. “I’d grown to love serving two masters,” he thinks, “perhaps so as never truly to answer to either one.” Yet Paul’s state isn’t a dilemma in search of an answer. We go with him the way we go with Anton Chekhov’s characters, enmeshed in the humanness of the drama. When Chloe, an on-again, off-again lover since college, confronts Paul, asking about his new lover, “Did you tell her you’ll always want something else and something more?”, we see it for the tender inquiry it is.”


























Sunday, November 06, 2016

November 2

Yesterday  Nov 2  Va went to Larson’s for the EEG test.  We did that about two years ago?  Same young woman who likes riding motorcycles.  Larson has a new haircut, beard even bigger and fuller, comb-over still there but much diminished and the rest almost shaved off completely.   Looks better, really, even sort of hip by today’s fashions.  He said he thought Va looks better than ever and that this last event was nothing even though it was good to go to the hospital and take the cautious route. 
On the way to Concord I stopped here to drop off a package for UPS and learned that poor Mark has died that morning.  Talked with Barbara T about it, she was in shock, her business next door. 

We’ve been drinking “golden milk” each evening to encourage good sleeping, a recipe Va found on Facebook.  Basically a sort of Indian coconut-tumeric chai, heated.  I made some last night that was too strong.   All day yesterday and this morning I’ve had the urge to fast so am doing so today.  Is it a seasonal thing?  In November do we want to eat less, hibernate more?  Brad Pilon had a tweet on twitter and that reminded me of what he urges. 

Phil explains his use of the Whitman quotation---I must say that phrase is famous and I had never thought of using it in the way Phil does---“contain” as a defensive stance, against, it seems exploding from within. 

“I included the quote from Whitman's Leaves of Grass at the start of "Damaged Lives."  "It's usually quoted as "I am large.  I contain multitudes."  I included just the latter because my story was going to be about people who weren't the childlike victims of events that today's psychology insists people are, but, rather, were adults who could contain many disturbing thoughts and experiences within themselves.   Tim and Libby weren't children.  If they occasionally suffered PTSD, it didn't overwhelm them.  They contained it.”

Whitman’s sense I thought was expansive.  He turns it into a contractive sense of meaning.  Containing the damage, limiting the effects.   Hmmm
No response to my Schaumann anecdote.  Maybe I had told it to him before?

Maybe also I read Edmund White’s novel before.  I suspect so but cannot recall for sure.  Bugs me.  Few more pages in and I think not. 
Sped through the letters between Porter and Schaumann.  She certainly led him on, or they both deluded themselves and each other, perhaps because the war had just ended and everyone was wounded and needy and confused.  Not many of his letters.  He was only thirty-five.  Affair with an older woman, a famous writer now out in Hollywood.  Starstruck and in denial.  She was sympathetic to a young soldier with ambitions to write.  The letter-writing itself was the vehicle of romance. 

Friday am  Phil explains what I didn’t know about K A Porter---that she was a tough, hard-drinking broad.  Guess it does make the tale all the more sad.
his reply this morning---
My big scabs are slowly healing yet  last week got VERY itchy.  I tried several kinds of lotion but found that aloe vera was the only one that really relieved the itch.


Professor Schaumann sounds like a very sad, lonely man even if he knew Hamilton and K. A. Porter.  The latter, according to what I know, was a tough, hard-drinking broad.   Not exactly the kind to render some lonely guy some emotional support.  I also think he considered you a smart, sensitive kid and was looking for some positive feedback from you.   Did you really just say "thank you" and walk out?  On the other hand, I admit it must have felt more than a little uncomfortable.  Was the guy gay?  Married or single?  


This story comes across as rather sad.  



--------------
The inner experience of that whole tale is, I guess, what I don’t want to try to explain to anyone, try to tell.  I experienced it as another sort of illumination, an immersion in a bright warm glow of comforting light and a dropping down into it, into its bottomless depths, much like the experience of the yoga lesson had been in Ammendale.  Linked to my time in the hospital, linked to my whole spiritual autobiography as I suppose we would have to phrase it were it to be spun out as a more full narrative. 

While swimming---Schaumann’s relationship with Porter fits perfectly as patterns go with our own Hans and Mary M.  He must have been about 45 when he had a flirtatious romance with her, even lived with her for a while, until, Va says, she asked him if he really preferred men.  She might have been 5-7 or more years older?  So younger gay man romances older, tougher woman, a complete Jungian archetype counter-transfer going on, I suppose.  The anima in the gay man responding to the animus in the tough, hard-drinking older woman.  Son-mother, but moreso, romancing knight to the unavailable queen.  Courtly love.  And as the letters show, the delusion and then disillusionment for each. 

Sunday  Nov 6  Nicaragua club ladies came and planted the bulbs.  Starting to clear up.  Maybe if I write non-stop for three days, Hillary will vanquish Lump.  Maybe if I fast.  Maybe if I praise the surge in Latino women voters. 
“It has often seemed to me in England that the purest enjoyment of architecture was to be had among the ruins of great buildings.”—H. James
from Levi Stahl on twitter 
“The mind makes something out of nothing or turns something into nothing.  It adds to and subtracts from the sum of things.  What it find harder is to refrain from doing so. “   Paul Valery, Analects

Over my crush on Van Dusen.  Like most his late book, Returning to the Source because in there he is relaxed, warm, embracing all and everything and urging us to enjoy the mystical or contemplative life without worry about special techniques or special devotions or this or that practice.  It’s all good, all natural, and all leads to the same One.  Yet you can see how he and Swedenborg fit perfectly as exemplars of Jung’s or Myers-Briggs’ INTJ.  Clear demarcatiions and strict hierarchical structures.  Feeling gets its place but as the origin of Thought and Thought is superior and dominant.  Amazing how clearly they demonstrate the theory. 
So we’re still looking for a VanDusen of the opposite type.  Blake, of course, for the P and perhaps for FP.  But I’d like to find a contemporary or 20th C FP version of Van Dusen.  His work was a great reminder to me and woke me back up a bit.  Gary Lachman’s work is still the most vibrant and interesting I’ve got in tow now.  Kripal has faded as well although I must still look at the closing pages of Impossible. 
Sent Gary Lachman my three dumb questions.  Wonder if he will reply at all and how. 

Something strange about Kripal’s conclusions after all of his investigations into the paranormal, the roads of excess, the experiences of religion reported by the various writers he studies.  He decides hermeneutics, interpretation of texts, of narrative, is the key figure for the nature of the cosmos and our place in it.  “writing can become a paranormal practice.”  “An author of the impossible is someone who knows that the Human is Two and One.” 270
Ok, yes.  But isn’t this making of writing and reading something akin to the oversimplifications of any thinker---and can’t any human activity become a paranormal practice?  Why privilege writing? 

    “I sat at a sidewalk table of one of the cafés facing the Charléty stadium.  I constructed all the hypotheses concerning Philippe de Pacheco, whose face I didn’t even know.  I took notes.  Without fully realizing it, I began writing my first book.  It was neither a vocation nor a particular gift that pushed me to write, but quite simply the enigma posed by a man I had no chance of finding again, and by all those questions that would never have an answer.  . . .  A girl was walking under the leaves of the treese along Boulevard Jourdan.  Her blond bangs, cheekbones, and green dress were the only note of freshness on that early August afternoon.  Why bother chasing ghosts and trying to solve insoluble mysteries, when life was there in all its simplicity, beneath the sun?”  --Patrick Modiano, Suspended Sentences 180

Monday, May 09, 2016

Woman in Turquoise

It seemed a harmless exercise and after I looked it over I thought it was all the more fitting as a play on the tip to the detective.  I had no idea if the tip had any value.  It was much as if I had made up a short story, or the start of a novel.  As if I had found a novel in the lobby, reworked it a bit, and then given it to the police and said here, here is what I think is a key in the crime you are solving. 

After three or fours months I had carried out about six deliveries.  By then I had established by custom, word-of-mouth and I suppose instructions by the hotel staffers exactly how to request my courier service.  Today a woman approached and she executed the situation with perfection that showed she had done her homework.  I appreciated that and told herself.  She smiled knowingly.  She might have been fifty.  Understated elegance, a dark turquoise suit, blonde hair styled into a flattering curve around her face.  She sat down in the chair next to mine in the lobby.  I would like to engage your service she said, sure that the usual introductory exchanges were not to be used.  Find, I said, explain the details.  Not a hint of her story, of anyone’s story.  No appeals, no explanations or background.  She opened her large leather purse, a fine piece of workmanship, perhaps Portuguese or Moroccan workmanship, I couldn’t be sure.  She handed me a medium sized, soft leather pouch, light gray colored leather, trimmed in burgundy welting.  For Thursday, she said simply, between 2 and 4, to room 57 at the Phoenix Copenhagen.  I nodded my approval and acceptance of the task.  She began to rise, paused and seated again, and said, perhaps I will say hello again to you on Friday or during the week after.  This is a bit unusual, I did not welcome or expect clients to check in with me after the job had completed or to seek any further information or approval.  Fine, I said, it won’t be necessay but it could be fine to chat a bit.  With that she rose and walked away. 

I like the Phoenix and had even considered using it as one of my three bases.  But it is too grand and showy for my taste these days.  I knocked on the door of room 57 at 3:12 Thursday afternoon.  An aide of some sort opened the door and took the pouch.  I thanked him for delivering it properly, I was sure he would.  This was the modus operandi I had worked out over the first six months in the city and it was what I wanted to use fore the remainder of my enterprise while I was there.  “Enterprise” is of course the wrong word.  No money was involved.  I had too much of that now and I simply wanted to “be of service” as the cliché has it.  I wanted some slight activity for this late phase of my life.  I enjoyed imagining what value it might have rather than knowing or want to know if it did or not.  What was in the soft gray pouch could have been anything.  I enjoyed making the judgment in an instant, as soon as I saw the person asking, much as a jury is said to make its mind up as to guilt or innocence as soon as it lays eyes on the defendant for the first time. 

Tuesday, May 03, 2016

Jacobsen's Spoon

Fourth day in a row of solid rain and gray.  I am trying not to note such things.  Late in the afternoon Inspector Gronquist spoke to me where I was reading in the lobby of the Nyhaven.  He had another man with him.  This is Detective Bergen, he said.  This man looked like he was in his late forties.  Some experience but not yet enough.  Short-cropped brown hair, tall, an expressionon his face of startled alertness.  I could not tell if he is Danish or Swedish or from somewhere else.  He will be handling this from now on, said Gronquist.  This? I asked.  That body you happened to see a few weeks ago being carried out.  I didn’t know it was a “this” I had anything more to do with.  He smiled tightly and turned to go.  Bergen will fill you in, perhaps you can help him.  I nodded to Bergen and he sat in the big chair to my left.  He opened a case and took out some papers, shuffling them in a way that made me wonder if he was looking for a way to open his topic to me in the most favorable way.  He was, it turned out.  Gronquist suggested, we wondered, oh, I’m now in charge of this incident.  Gronquist passed it to me.  We wondered if you could offer some suggestions?  I told Gronquist weeks ago I had no interest in being involved in such things, I said.  Yes, but it turns out to be out of the ordinary.  Even for Copenhagen?  Yes, even for Copenhagen.  It was a welcome distraction on this dark gray late afternoon.  Bergen said the body was not that of a Brazilian diplomat afterall but that of a powerful Brazilian family who of course wanted every detail to be guarded as much as possible.  Drugs, sex, money, the usual items?  Jewels?  No, he nodded steadily, none of the above.  This is why we thought, Gronquist thought, you might think of something.  For you?  Well, for us, perhaps, perhaps with us.  How long had he been here?  It seems he had been traveling for a few months, Europe mainly, in and out of Denmark and Sweden during that time, a few days at a time.  How old was he?  Forties.  You’re age?  Yes, probably, my age.  Fashionably dressed of course, good looking, not married, but not involved so far as anyone has found out.  Right, Bergen said.  I took my Arne Jacobsen spoon out of my pocket.  Do you recognize this?  No, Bergen said.  This will seem too easy to me, but for you it might be a surprise then.  Seems so.  Was your Brazilian entangled in Design counterintelligence?  Computers, software, that sort of thing? Begen asked, looking a bit skeptical.  No, no, I said, look at this spoon, see how it angles, the shallow bowl turned to the left of the shaft?  Design as in Danish design for houses, furniture, dinnerware, crystal, cutlery, this spoon and others in its set.  Bergen tried to stifle a smile.  My parents talked about such things but I confess I don’t know about it.  Would this Brazilian have been killed because of something like this?  No, not exactly.  Since the rise of Scandinavian design as a “world power” as it were in the mid 1950s, Copenhagen, Oslo, these cities have become scenes of intense competition and a good deal of secrecy in the whole gobal world of high design.  Tremendous fear of new ideas being stolen, knocked-off, leaked, traded.  But the magazines are full of these things, photos, glossy spreads, ads, Bergen objected.  Yes, but as with all such worlds, what you see there is what has been secured, managed, branded they call it, made public.  But behind all of that stage-setting, power and its discontents make for more intrigue than any magazine browser could ever guess.  Much like the Paris fashion world.  The Paris, New York, Tokyo, Moscow etc worlds.  But how could we try to find out if this Brazilian fellow was involved in such things?  I don’t have much to offer you, Mr Bergen, and I had made clear to Inspector Gronquist that I wanted to offer you people nothing at all for your work.  He looked disappointed and went quiet for a few minutes, looking back through a sheaf of papers on his lap.

Wednesday, January 27, 2016

Friday night  13th November 2015

Michel Tournier’s novel The Ogre arrived earlier today.  Looking up stuff about him.  On a site called Books and Writers by Bamber Gascoigne this passage about one of Tournier’s novels---

 “In 1975 there appeared Les Météores (Gemini), a baroque treatment of the myth of Castor and Pollux, which could be read as a contemporary version of Jules Verne's Around the World in Eighty Days. Beginning from Crusoe, Tournier's men are often solitary characters; he sees that the the natural antagonism of male and female is the major source of problems for human beings. In Gemini Thomas Koussek argues that "the heterosexual wants to lead the free, unattached life of the homosexual nobility. But the more he breaks out, the more firmly he is recalled to his proletarian condition." “  This
alignment of sexual identity with class structure is something no one would make in this country but it is pretty interesting, especially if male-female is the source of all human problems.  Again, these days, no one dare make that claim. 

Weds Dec 23  first day of winter, the solstice turn was last night
and tonight at 9:28 pm I have just read this in Tournier’s novel The Ogre:  They are celebrating the Sun Child, “risen from his ashes at the winter solstice.  The sun’s trajectory had reached its lowest level and the day was the shortest of the year: the death of the sun god was therefore lamented as an impending cosmic fatality.  Funeral chants celebrating the woe of the earth and the inhospitableness of the sky praised the dead luminary’s virtues and begged him to return among men.  And the lament was answered, for from then on every day would gain on the night, at first imperceptibly but soon with triumphant ease.”  page 264


Christmas Day

Finished The Ogre, 9:40 pm.  rushed to get it over with, distracted and not much interested in the last five pages. 

from The Complete Review

"Tournier ever longs to entrap in the single event, in the single thought or word, both the elemental and cultured, historical and perverse, anarchic and fascistic. So it is with The Mirror of Ideas" - James Sallis, Review of Contemporary Fiction

"The Mirror of Ideas is hardly a skeleton key to Tournier's fiction or biography. Only occasionally do we guess that Tournier may be talking about himself." - Kenneth Baker, San Francisco Chronicle

"This volume displays Tournier at his finest, which is to say his most outrageous. The style is as fluent as ever, but the content, depending upon whether one is a feminist, a philosopher, an atheist or a cat-lover, will either annoy, exasperate, provoke or amuse." - William Cloonan, South Atlantic Review


“will either annoy, exasperate, provoke or amuse." - William Cloonan, South Atlantic Review

liked this comment about Tournier on Complete Review.  Seems that’s what he does in all of his novels, so that was The Ogre.  A stew of interesting stuff, a deconstruction of the male war machines, the Nazis as well as today’s Isis, although strangely missing is adult homoeroticism, replaced by the pedaphilia, all of it drawn from Goethe’s Erl-King, which I think our American reader of myths, Robert Bly, must have used in his work.  It seems that in his next novel, Gemini, he treats that topic. 

Since I was so fascinated by twins years back (is it something one likes in one’s fifties?, I might read this Gemini--my star sign after all, too.  Tournier is irritating and yet I guess he provides a unique sort of entertainment, reading experience. 


Tuesday  29th  Snow this morning.  Slushy though.


Tournier’s work intrigues, alas.  Someone commented that his work deals only with men and what’s that about?  The Gemini did indeed occupy my imagination a while back so why not investigate.  Have to calculate but that was twenty years ago.  So how old was Tournier when he wrote his novels?  He has a memoir too and I’ll look up sites today, snow day, for more info.  Am afraid The King of Alders, the Erl-King, The Ogre, has stayed with me more than I would have wanted it to as I read it.  I thought I was irritated by it but of course irritation a fine line away from fascination.  And I realize his place in the late 20thC geist about deconstructin and multiple-voicing everything.  So wouldn’t I had I been in his career.  Plus his re-writing of Crusoe is perfect for my Copenhagen.  Crusoe in Copenhagen I could even call it.  The man alone after a shipwreck.  I’ve never read Crusoe and the Tom Hanks movie, not seen, put me off ever wanting to.  But it is the model for the philosophical novel in English. 

Found the put-down of the day, an anonymous Kirkus reviewer from 1984  “And the best stories here are, in fact, the most straightforward, conventional dramatizations of Tournier's mythic preoccupations: ""The Lily of the Valley Rest Area"" reveals the epicureanism of two French long-haul truck drivers; and ""The Fetishist"" is the expected monologue about women's frilly underwear. Inventive, tingly curosities at best, then--but far too often Tournier seems like no more than a cerebral Joyce Carol Oates, lazily toying with dark urges and forbidden pleasures.
Pub Date: Sept. 14th, 1984

ouch, that hurts.  Can only hope the reviewer is wrong. 

Dreary day.  Wet snow, rainy, short excursion to the dump and that was it.  Day off tomorrow.  Or half a day.  Kathie will do pool work with Willow in the morning.  No appointment with Feeney.  Nothing from Paquin.  Or Scott or anybody else.  Doug came in for a glass of wine while Ben plowed the driveway.  Invited himself in and asked for a wine.  ! 

A better article by John Yargo appeared this year on The Rumpus.
A good line from it is “The ultimate destination of a spiritual journey, Tournier reminds us, has to be obscure.”

That’s good.  So Tournier liked Bachelard and studied philosophy. 

3 Dec

For now I am a Tournier-o-phile.  Very much a school days memory book, so far.  Blustery rainy day.  Furnace guy called to clarify the water problem in the basement.  Paula here. 
Va proposed we plot a day in Cambridge tomorrow while the weather is good

27 Dec Sunday

Finished reading a very strange novel called The Ogre by Michel Tournier.  Turns out it was a John Malkovich movie in 1996.  Analysis of Nazisim through use of German mythology about St Chrisopher (the Erl King) and pedophilia. !  Some brainy stuff throughout but "not recommended" is my review.  Shoulda been an essay, a book, i.e. dissertation. 


31 Dec

40 pages into Gemini and Tournier has me hooked.  Delicious and pointed and sharply intelligent and more.  Me and Genet agree here.  Or will do. 

10 January 2016

Tournier’s Gemini  The bloom is off that rose.  At least a bit.  No matter what Genet says on the back cover.  In fact that blurb itself might now do more to damn the book and the career to the remembered past more than keep it alive.  How far removed the headlines about gender and sexuality are from the world Genet wrote about and, it seems, Tournier took his turn with.  I’ll finish Gemini when I get back.  I’m 173 page in out of 452.  I could cut the book down the spine and take it with me but that doesn’t seem that essential or necessary.  It will wait.  It might still surprise me, but at the moment the voice of Alexandre feels less intriguing and interesting than I had at first thought.  And his gender politics feel antiquated, as I noted above.  Could just as well cut up Lurid & Cute, but that too seems extreme.  India beckons on this stormy night.

Thurs Jan 21

Tournier’s twins book is better.  His portrait of Alexandre could be Donato and could sum up the views of generations of members of their caste.  Wish the tour guide would have talked about the caste system in Indian history.  Will we try to go back to India?  At this point, hard to say.  Just to visit with Kenna?  Somehow I don’t think so.  To visit Mumbai and Kerala and the greatest of Hindu temples?  Maybe.  Waiting for more prompts on this question.  For now still getting over the exhaustion.  And yet “news” of Lachman’s book via Nicholas seems somehow a result of the trip.  As well as all of our own interior spiritual processing of what just happened. 

Remembered I have Tournier’s autobiography now too.  Earlier I’d wondered if Alexandre was autobio but further on into the book I think he’s making it up and is more interested in his binary conceptualism as imaged by the twins.  The twinification syndrome. 

Sunday  Jan 24  2016

Reading around in Tournier’s “autobiography.”  Which it hardly is.  More like essays on my great novels and explications of them.  Still, he gives helpful tips about Gemini and what he was trying to do in it.  He even mentions Modiano in reference to how dangerous it is to a novel when the author introduces a vivid homosexual character who can take over and direct the work in ways the writer had not intended. 

Tournier loses me fast and now that I’m midway in Gemini I wonder if I will ever finish it.  He explains exactly what he’s after and this turns out to be what turns me off.  “As I state previously, my novels are all attempts to render certain metaphysical ideas in the form of images and stories.”  Ok, but that interests me less than he wants it to.  Burke would love his next sentence (he’s defending his interest in his characters’ chamber pots): “Well, it’s a simple fact that ontology when tossed into the crucible of fiction undergoes a partial metamorphosis into scatology.  The most interesting part of the material on Gemini is a letter from a twin who says Tournier captures the essence of twinness as a perfection of incestuousness.  The twin and his brother slept with their mother and more or less with one another until about the age of twenty when they finally separated out from the family triangle and developed separate lives.   Why does the reader (moi) suspect that Tournier might be making this up?  Burke does that every so often in his books.  Whether he did or not, it confirms the fact that for me Tournier is less a novelist-poet than an essayist, a fabulist in Sheldon Sacks’ terms, writing parables and teaching stories, philosophy in narrative forms.  Too cerebral, too left brain, too mentalistic.  Alpha too.  Where’s the feeling?  His characters are puppets of his notions, his monadology.  He hates mathmatics or had no talent for it in school and yet his books seem like rubics cubes, like Kehlmann’s novel, F, that I read on the plane.  Puzzle constructs or ontological game-codes.  Kehlmann’s touch with it all is much lighter and more playful than Tournier’s.  He is too pleased with himself, the self-absorbed bachelor ontological puppet-master. 

Hope shifted back now to Gebser.  And more likely to go back to Modiano than Tournier. 

Monday  Jan 25

Swimming this morning.  Back to routines.  And now I’m reading more of Tournier after all, the chapter 2 entitled The Ogre (the novel I read first) in which he describes the Nazi occupation of France as he experienced it and what followed in his life.  He was 19 when the war ended and the Germans retreated.  And his family knew German  language, literature and culture very deeply. 

Bach’s Art of the Fugue a big inspiration, model. 

He has an amazing tale to tell about being twenty and living in Germany right after the war.  I suspect others wondered out loud--why didn’t you write all of this instead of writing it in the form of those bloody novels?  In the chapter on The Ogre he says “I never had any intention of writing fantasy.  My aim was to achieve a realism that became fantastic only through an extreme of precision and tationalism: hyperrrealism plus hyperrationalism.”  93  Wind Spirit

“Bachelard taught me not only the versatility of dialectic but also that hallmark of all genuine philosophical investigation, laughter. . . No, the truth is simply that laughter is the sign of man’s approach to the absolute.”  124-125

January 27, 2016  I skim the few pages left in Chapter 11 of Gemini page 250 of 452 pages total.  Unconvincing pages about the Germans arriving in Paris and Hitler having his photo taken at the Eiffel tower.  No interest in reading further.  So now we bid Tournier adieu. 

Wednesday, December 23, 2015

Book and life converge

Weds Dec 23  first day of winter, the solstice turn was last night and tonight at 9:28 pm I have just read this in Tournier’s novel The Ogre:  They are celebrating the Sun Child, “risen from his ashes at the winter solstice.  The sun’s trajectory had reached its lowest level and the day was the shortest of the year: the death of the sun god was therefore lamented as an impending cosmic fatality.  Funeral chants celebrating the woe of the earth and the inhospitableness of the sky praised the dead luminary’s virtues and begged him to return among men.  And the lament was answered, for from then on every day would gain on the night, at first imperceptibly but soon with triumphant ease.”  page 264

Saturday, November 21, 2015

Lines from Chris Kraus

Schizophrenics aren’t sunk into themselves.  Associatively, they’re hyperactive.  The world gets creamy like a library. 231

Anyone who feels too much or radiates extremity gets very lonely.  227

“Schizophrenia,” Géza Róhreim wrote, “is the magical psychosis.”  A search for proof.  An orgy of coincidences.) 226

Capitalism’s ethics are completely schizophrenic; i.e., they’re contradictory and duplicitous.  Buy Cheap, Sell Dear.  Psychiatry tries its hardest to conceal this, tracing all disturbances back to the Holy Triangle of Mommy-Daddy-Me.  “ The unconscious needs to be created,” Félix wrote in Mary Barnes’ Trip. A brilliant model.  226

If art’s a seismographic project, when that project meets with failure, failure must become a subject too.  217

How I like to dip into other people’s books, to catch the rhythm of their thinking, as I try to write my own.  Writing around the edges of Philip K. Dick, Ann Rower, Marcel Proust, Eileen Myles and Alice Notley.  It’s better than sex. Reading delivers on the promise that sex raises but hardly ever can fulfill--getting larger cause you’re entering another person’s language, cadence, heart and mind.  207

the ideal reader is one who is in love with the writer & combs the text for clues about that person & how they think--- 132

The rest was history, or, Chris had gotten one thing right: beneath his reputation at the Mudd Club as the philosopher of kinky sex, Sylvère was a closet humanist.  Guilt and duty more than S&M propelled his life.  109

To initiate something is to play the fool. I really came off the fool with you, sending the fax, etcetera.  Oh well.   I feel so sorry we were never able to communicate, Dick.  Signals through the flames.  Not waving but drowning.  91

Accepting contradictions means not believing anymore in the primacy of “true feelings.”  Everything is true and simultaneously.  87

The Bataille Boys saw beatitude in the victim’s agonized expression as the executioner sawed off his last remaining limb.  33


Chris Kraus, I Love Dick.  Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 1997, 2006.